Figure 2.
Results of the numerical simulations of the qMT parameters as a function of fat fraction, focusing on (a.) PSR, (b.) kmf, (c.) T2f, and (d.) T2m. Notice that (a.), (b.), and (d.) all show increased variance with increasing fat fraction, while (b.) and (c.) show significantly different deviations from the true value at relatively low fat fractions (20% and 30% fat, respectively).