Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 19;2016:3154929. doi: 10.1155/2016/3154929

Table 2.

Effect of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation conditions on sugar beet pulp-based wort fermentation factors and intake of sugars.

Fermentation trial Parameters Pretreatment
Without pretreatment, pulp suspended in water Pressure-thermal pretreatment Ultrasound pretreatment
30 min 60 min 50% amplitude, 20 min 100% amplitude, 20 min
Pulp suspended in water Pulp suspended in 2% w/w sulfuric acid solution Pulp suspended in water Pulp suspended in 2% w/w sulfuric acid solution Pulp suspended in water Pulp suspended in 2% w/w sulfuric acid solution Pulp suspended in water Pulp suspended in 2% w/w sulfuric acid solution
Initial fermentable sugar content as sum of glucose, fructose, galactose, saccharose, and xylose [g/L] 51.75 ± 1.55a 55.18 ± 1.65a 62.21 ± 1.86b 55.45 ± 1.65a 62.85 ± 1.90b 52.23 ± 1.40a 51.43 ± 1.54a 51.27 ± 1.54a 54.67 ± 1.64a

Without enzymatic activation Ethanol content (g/L) 14.3 ± 0.6a 19.9 ± 0.7efgh 22.5 ± 1.1hij 20.5 ± 0.8fghi 22.7 ± 0.9ij 15.8 ± 0.4ab 16.3 ± 0.5abc 16.2 ± 0.5abc 17.5 ± 0.7bcde
Fermentation efficiency
(% of the theoretical yield)
54.2 ± 2.2a 70.7 ± 2.3cdefgh 70.9 ± 3.5defgh 72.5 ± 2.8fghi 80.3 ± 3.1ij 59.4 ± 1.5ab 62.2 ± 1.9abcd 62.1 ± 1.9abc 62.7 ± 2.5abcde
Intake of hexoses (%) 85.1 ± 2.4abcdef 83.2 ± 2.5abc 83.8 ± 2.2abcd 84.2 ± 2.6abcde 83.8 ± 2.5abcd 82.1 ± 2.4a 82.8 ± 2.5ab 85.2 ± 2.5abcdef 85.1 ± 2.4abcdef
Intake of xylose (%) 65.3 ± 1.5a 75.2 ± 1.8cdef 77.2 ± 1.5defgh 76.2 ± 1.4cdefg 77.5 ± 1.6defgh 67.3 ± 1.5ab 74.5 ± 1.5cd 76.2 ± 1.5cdefg 71.3 ± 1.5bc

Enzymatic activation, Variant I∗∗ Ethanol content (g/L) 16.7 ± 0.5abcd 22.5 ± 0.7hij 26.9 ± 1.2k 23.6 ± 0.9j 27.1 ± 1.2k 17.5 ± 0.6bcde 18.3 ± 0.7bcdef 18.1 ± 0.6bcdef 18.7 ± 0.8cdef
Fermentation efficiency
(% of the theoretical yield)
63.3 ± 1.8bcde 80.1 ± 2.3ij 86.5 ± 2.1j 83.4 ± 3.2j 84.4 ± 3.7j 65.8 ± 2.2bcdefg 69.8 ± 2.7cdefgh 69.3 ± 2.3cdefg 67.0 ± 2.9bcdefg
Intake of hexoses (%) 91.6 ± 2.5efgh 88.2 ± 2.2abcdefgh 90.3 ± 2.4bcdefgh 90.5 ± 2.5cdefgh 95.5 ± 2.6h 89.2 ± 2.5abcdefgh 88.6 ± 2.2abcdefgh 88.2 ± 2.2abcdefgh 87.5 ± 2.5abcdefg
Intake of xylose (%) 74.5 ± 2.5cd 86.5 ± 2.6jkl 88.2 ± 1.9kl 87.5 ± 1.8kl 89.5 ± 1.5l 83.5 ± 1.6ijk 80.5 ± 1.2efghi 82.5 ± 1.5hijk 81.5 ± 1.4ghij

Enzymatic activation, Variant II∗∗ Ethanol content (g/L) 16.9 ± 0.5abcd 22.1 ± 0.8ghij 26.6 ± 1.5k 22.7 ± 0.8ij 26.9 ± 1.5k 18.1 ± 0.6bcdef 18.6 ± 0.8cdef 19.2 ± 0.7def 19.6 ± 0.7efg
Fermentation efficiency
(% of the theoretical yield)
64.3 ± 1.6bcdef 78.5 ± 2.8hij 83.8 ± 4.7j 80.3 ± 2.7ij 83.8 ± 4.2j 68.0 ± 2.3bcdefg 71.0 ± 2.8efgh 73.6 ± 2.6ghi 70.3 ± 2.5cdefgh
Intake of hexoses (%) 91.3 ± 2.2defgh 88.2 ± 2.6abcdefgh 92.0 ± 2.5fgh 89.5 ± 1.8abcdefgh 93.0 ± 1.5gh 88.3 ± 2.2abcdefgh 88.5 ± 2.2abcdefg 86.2 ± 2.5abcdefg 88.2 ± 2.4abcdefgh
Intake of xylose (%) 74.9 ± 1.9cde 83.3 ± 2.2ijk 88.1 ± 2.2kl 85.2 ± 2.2ijkl 89.5 ± 2.2l 74.9 ± 1.9cde 80.8 ± 1.5fghi 80.3 ± 2.0efghi 80.5 ± 1.5efghi

Results expressed as mean values ± SE (n = 3); a-bmean values for initial fermentable sugar content with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA); a–lmean values for ethanol content, fermentation efficiency, intake of hexoses, and intake of xylose with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, two-way ANOVA).

Without enzymatic activation: inoculation with yeast Ethanol Red immediately after application of enzyme preparations.

∗∗Enzymatic activation, Variant I: inoculation with yeast Ethanol Red after 6 h of enzymatic preparations action (Viscozyme 0.02 mL/g d.m.; Ultraflo Max 0.02 mL/g d.m., 40°C). Enzymatic activation, Variant II: inoculation with yeast Ethanol Red after 6 h of enzymatic preparations action (Viscozyme 0.015 mL/g d.m.; Ultraflo Max 0.015 mL/g d.m., 48–50°C).