Table 4. Performance comparison of MSPV,
, and
, MMPV,
, and
, in terms of
,
,
, and AUC, evaluated evaluated on datasets A, B, and C.
Dataset | Techniques |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dataset A | MSPV | 67.59 | 67.44 | 67.51 | 0.72 |
![]() |
70.26 | 71.37 | 70.81 | 0.75 | |
![]() |
70.91 | 81.33 | 75.76 | 0.79 | |
MMPV | 65.27 | 77.86 | 71.01 | 0.72 | |
![]() |
77.64 | 71.53 | 74.46 | 0.77 | |
![]() |
79.94 | 78.46 | 79.19 | 0.82 | |
Dataset B | MSPV | 80.51 | 68.34 | 73.93 | 0.77 |
![]() |
75.81 | 74.89 | 75.35 | 0.79 | |
![]() |
79.54 | 72.04 | 75.60 | 0.79 | |
MMPV | 75.37 | 75.36 | 75.36 | 0.78 | |
![]() |
78.57 | 75.27 | 76.88 | 0.80 | |
![]() |
79.29 | 73.80 | 76.44 | 0.80 | |
Dataset C | MSPV | 72.00 | 76.00 | 73.95 | 0.74 |
![]() |
73.00 | 78.00 | 75.42 | 0.75 | |
![]() |
73.00 | 79.00 | 75.88 | 0.75 | |
MMPV | 76.43 | 74.99 | 75.70 | 0.77 | |
![]() |
72.00 | 82.00 | 76.68 | 0.77 | |
![]() |
74.00 | 81.00 | 77.34 | 0.77 | |
Dataset D | MSPV | 60.58 | 52.70 | 56.37 | 0.56 |
![]() |
64.94 | 55.44 | 59.81 | 0.61 | |
![]() |
66.63 | 51.31 | 57.98 | 0.62 | |
MMPV | 60.40 | 59.76 | 60.08 | 0.60 | |
![]() |
66.01 | 57.85 | 61.66 | 0.64 | |
![]() |
67.65 | 61.15 | 64.24 | 0.67 | |
All | MSPV | 64.33 | 66.93 | 65.60 | 0.66 |
![]() |
74.33 | 62.58 | 67.95 | 0.68 | |
![]() |
75.45 | 62.43 | 68.32 | 0.70 | |
MMPV | 75.62 | 61.53 | 67.85 | 0.67 | |
![]() |
72.64 | 65.09 | 68.65 | 0.71 | |
![]() |
72.02 | 69.16 | 70.56 | 0.73 |
The highest performance for each dataset for each metric is shown in bold.