Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 18;115(7):866–875. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.250

Table 1. Diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer following EP by patients' socio-demographic characteristics (univariable analysis).

  Colon cancer
Rectal cancer
  Non-EPa EP Total   Non-EPa EP Total  
  N=668 N=361 N=1029   N=490 N=87 N=577  
  % % N P-valueb % % N P-valueb
Gender
Men 67.8 32.2 537 0.044 87.5 12.5 336 0.041
Women 61.8 38.2 492   81.3 18.7 241  
Age (years)
25–59 67.8 32.2 152 0.041 92.8 7.2 97 0.003
60–69 68.6 31.4 204   85.0 15.0 133  
70–79 69.6 30.4 362   86.6 13.4 216  
80+ 55.6 44.4 311   76.3 23.7 131  
Socio-economic deprivation quintile
1 (least deprived) 67.2 32.8 268 0.159 90.9 9.1 143 <0.001
2 63.0 37.0 211   86.4 13.6 125  
3 69.3 30.7 228   87.2 12.8 125  
4 63.4 36.6 205   81.1 18.9 111  
5 (most deprived) 57.3 42.7 117   72.6 27.4 73  
Geographic region
North 66.0 34.0 235 0.780 80.1 19.9 151 0.170
Midlands/East England 62.5 37.5 307   85.3 14.7 177  
London 66.2 33.8 71   82.5 17.5 40  
South 65.9 34.1 416   88.5 11.5 209  

Abbreviation: EP=emergency presentation.

a

Non-emergency routes included non-urgent GP referrals (colon cancer: 36% rectal cancer: 45%), ‘two-week wait' GP referrals (colon cancer: 10% rectal cancer: 21%) and elective in-/out-patients (20% for both cancers). Screening accounted only for 0.2% of rectal cancers, as the programme started in 2006.

b

χ2-Test was used for gender and region. Test for trend was used for age and socio-economic deprivation.