Skip to main content
letter
. 2016 Aug 23;115(7):858–861. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.260

Table 2. Physician–patient ECOG PS disagreement and risk of mortality.

Difference between physician- and patient-assigned ECOG PS Stratified by physician PS n HR (95% CI)a
Physician PS−patient PS=+2 0 12 NAb
Physician PS−patient PS=+1 0 183 NAb
Physician PS−patient PS=0 (reference) 0 799 0
Physician PS−patient PS=−1 0 344 1.78 (1.29–2.44)
Physician PS−patient PS=−2 0 71 1.58 (0.76–3.27)
Physician PS−patient PS=−3 0 9 7.64 (3.31–17.67)
Physician PS−patient PS=+2 1 12 NAb
Physician PS−patient PS=+1 1 183 0.70 (0.50–0.99)
Physician PS−patient PS=0 (reference) 1 799 0
Physician PS−patient PS=−1 1 344 0.66 (0.45–0.97)
Physician PS−patient PS=−2 1 71 1.53 (1.00–2.36)
Physician PS−patient PS=−3 1 9 4.42 (0.59–33.02)
Physician PS−patient PS=+2 2+ 12 0.65 (0.25–1.68)
Physician PS−patient PS=+1 2+ 183 0.76 (0.47–1.22)
Physician PS−patient PS=0 (reference) 2+ 799 0
Physician PS−patient PS=−1 2+ 344 1.05 (0.62–1.75)
Physician PS−patient PS=−2 2+ 71 0.88 (0.21–3.77)
Physician PS−patient PS=−3 2+ 9 NAb

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR=hazard ratio; NA=not available; PS=performance status.

a

Hazard ratio and 95% CI calculated by Cox-proportional hazards models; models adjusted for sex, age, physician-assigned PS and cancer type.

b

Models did not run due to an empty cell in this category.