Table 1.
Number of immigrants into each region through time. Note that the same individual may be labelled as a migrant in multiple years. Long-distance migrants (LDM) are a subsample of immigrants in the region, not additional individuals.
| 2004 | 2009–2010 | 2011–2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| southeast (SE) immigration | |||
| class | total (LDM) | total (LDM) | total (LDM) |
| immigrants | 11 (6) | 16 (7) | 22 (10) |
| immigrant offspring | 3 (3) | 10 (7) | 4 (3) |
| immigrant grandoffspring | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| total immigrants in region | 14 (9) | 26 (14) | 26 (13) |
| total bears sampled in region | 45 | 64 | 72 |
| percentage of region of immigrant origin | 31.11% (20.00%) | 40.63% (21.88%) | 36.11% (18.06%) |
| southwest (SW) immigration | |||
| immigrants | 5 (1) | 8 (3) | 7 (2) |
| immigrant offspring | 0 (0) | 4 (1) | 6 (0) |
| immigrant grandoffspring | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| total immigrants in region | 5 (1) | 12 (4) | 13 (2) |
| total bears sampled in region | 28 | 32 | 32 |
| percentage of region of immigrant origin | 17.86% (3.57%) | 37.50% (12.50%) | 40.63% (6.25%) |
| east-central (EC) immigration | |||
| immigrants | 27 (6) | 30 (11) | 41 (11) |
| immigrant offspring | 7 (5) | 14 (5) | 14 (5) |
| immigrant grandoffspring | 7 (3) | 4 (3) | 8 (4) |
| total immigrants in region | 41 (14) | 48 (19) | 63 (20) |
| total bears sampled in region | 98 | 104 | 120 |
| percentage of region of immigrant origin | 41.84% (14.29%) | 46.15% (18.27%) | 52.50% (16.67%) |