. 2016 Sep 2;172(2):635–649. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00793

Table I. Estimated speciation rates (λ), extinction rates (μ), and net diversification rates (r = λ − μ) associated with C₃ photosynthesis and CCM-based photosynthesis.

Missing values (NA) indicate rates that were not reported in the original study.

Clade	λ_C3	λ_CCM	μ_C3	μ_CCM	r_C3	r_CCM	Reference
Poales	0.996	1.454	0.954	1.242	0.042	0.212	Bouchenak‐Khelladi et al. (2014)
Poaceae^a	0.6924 (0.3627)	0.5667 (0.3011)	0.5539 (0.2857)	0.3267 (0.1667)	0.1386 (0.077)	0.24 (0.1344)	Spriggs et al. (2014)
Euphorbia	NA	NA	NA	NA	0.062	0.177	Horn et al. (2014)
Orchidaceae	0.362	1.482	0.381	1.356	−0.019	0.13	Givnish et al. (2015)
Bromelioideae	0.52	1.249	0.115	0.482	0.405	0.767	Silvestro et al. (2014)

Spriggs et al. (2014) included analyses based on two different dating hypotheses. Parentheses show values for the second phytolith-based dating hypothesis.

Table I. Estimated speciation rates (λ), extinction rates (μ), and net diversification rates (r = λ − μ) associated with C3 photosynthesis and CCM-based photosynthesis.

Table I. Estimated speciation rates (λ), extinction rates (μ), and net diversification rates (r = λ − μ) associated with C₃ photosynthesis and CCM-based photosynthesis.