Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Conscious Cogn. 2015 Feb 28;33:375–385. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.001

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Results from the speeded congruency task showing that (a) genuine synesthetes (indicated as “consistency <1”) were significantly more accurate than malingerers (indicated as “consistency ≥1”) and that (b) there was no significant difference in mean reaction time between these two groups. (Note that there are no values for participants who declared themselves to be non-synesthetes from the start because these individuals did not progress to the synesthesia assessment.)