Table 1:
Study | Design | Sampling period | Population | % with blood Hg concentration above guidance value (8 μg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nunavik Health Survey16 | Representative survey | 2004 | Inuit women aged 18–39 yr in Nunavik (northern Quebec) | 53.3 |
| ||||
NCDS8 | Birth cohort | 2005–10 | Inuit school-aged children in Nunavik | 16.9* |
| ||||
Canadian Health Measures Survey17 | Representative survey† | 2007–09 | Women aged 16–49 yr; Canada-wide study | 2.2 |
| ||||
Geometric mean‡ ± SD or (95% CI) for blood Hg concentration, μg/L | ||||
|
||||
NCDS8 | Birth cohort | 1995–01 | Pregnant Inuit women from Hudson Bay, Nunavik§ | 10.4 ± 0.4 |
| ||||
Maternal biomonitoring study18 | Convenience sample | 2005–07 | Pregnant Inuit women in Baffin region | 4.0 (3.4–4.7) |
| ||||
Pregnant Inuit women in Inuvik | 1.1 (0.85–1.5) | |||
| ||||
Pregnant Dene and Metis women in Inuvik | 0.70 (0.45–1.1) | |||
| ||||
Canadian Health Measures Survey17 | Representative survey | 2007–09 | Women aged 16–49 yr; Canada-wide study | 0.72 (0.50–0.94) |
| ||||
MIREC study19 | Birth cohort | 2008–11 | Pregnant women in 10 Canadian urban regions | 0.86 ± 2.84 |
Note: CI = confidence interval, Hg = mercury, MIREC = Maternal–Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals study, NCDS = Nunavik Child Development Study, SD = standard deviation.
Not published; proportion calculated directly from the NCDS mercury results.
The study does not obtain samples from Canadians residing on Crown land, in Indian reserves or in remote regions, such as northern Quebec.
Distributions of environmental concentrations are often skewed to the right and log-normally distributed. Consequently, many studies use geometric means to estimate central tendency, although this measure may be biased low.
The contemporary NCDS contains more than 1 birth cohort. These estimates come from one of the cohorts, and the sample comprises pregnant women recruited from the 3 largest communities in the Hudson Bay region of Nunavik.