Table 6.
Characteristics | Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c | |||||
|
AOR (95% CI) | P value | AOR (95% CI) | P value | AOR (95% CI) | P value | ||
Age (years) | .57 | .71 | .85 | |||||
|
<35 (ref) | |||||||
|
36-45 | 0.76 (0.49-1.19) | .23 | 0.77 (0.49-1.20) | .24 | 0.85 (0.53-1.36) | .50 | |
|
46-55 | 0.77 (0.50-1.19) | .24 | 0.80 (0.52-1.25) | .33 | 0.91 (0.57-1.45) | .69 | |
|
56-65 | 0.75 (0.47-1.19) | .22 | 0.79 (0.50-1.25) | .32 | 0.90 (0.55-1.47) | .67 | |
|
≥66 | 0.57 (0.29-1.10) | .10 | 0.63 (0.32-1.23) | .18 | 0.70 (0.35-1.42) | .32 |
|
Gender | ||||||||
|
Male (ref) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Female | 1.21 (0.99-1.48) | .07 | 1.16 (0.95-1.43) | .15 | 1.09 (0.88-1.36) | .43 | |
Marital status | .38 | .43 | .55 | |||||
|
Married (ref) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Widowed | 1.94 (0.60-5.46) | .21 | 1.99 (0.71-5.59) | .20 | 1.32 (0.46-3.80) | .61 | |
|
Single | 1.14 (0.86-1.50) | .37 | 1.13 (0.85-1.49) | .40 | 1.18 (0.88-1.59) | .27 | |
|
Divorced | 1.20 (0.85-1.69) | .31 | 1.15 (0.81-1.62) | .44 | 1.20 (0.83-1.74) | .34 | |
Internet use | .70 | .77 | .21 | |||||
|
Several times a day (ref) | |||||||
|
Once a day | 1.06 (0.72-1.56) | .77 | 1.13 (0.76-1.66) | .55 | 1.39 (0.92-2.10) | .12 | |
|
Less than once a day | 0.82 (0.50-1.35) | .44 | 0.91 (0.55-1.50) | .71 | 1.29 (0.75-2.24) | .36 | |
Medical specialty | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | |||||
|
General practitioner (ref) | |||||||
|
Specialist | 1.31 (1.04-1.66) | .03 | 1.16 (0.91-1.48) | .23 | 1.17 (0.91-1.51) | .23 | |
|
Others | 0.77 (0.55-1.08) | .13 | 0.68 (0.48-0.96) | .03 | 0.59 (0.41-0.85) | .004 | |
Jameda service product | ||||||||
|
Basic product (ref) | |||||||
|
Any service product (eg, gold, silver, platinum) |
|
|
1.61 (1.32-1.96) | <.001 | 1.13 (0.90-1.41) | .29 | |
Use of physician-rating websites (frequency) |
|
|
|
|
<.001 | |||
|
At least once per day (ref) | |||||||
|
Several times a week |
|
|
|
|
1.39 (0.86-2.23) | .18 | |
|
Once per week |
|
|
|
|
0.98 (0.63-1.51) | .91 | |
|
Once per month |
|
|
|
|
0.59 (0.38-0.90) | .01 | |
|
Less frequently |
|
|
|
|
0.39 (0.25-0.61) | <.001 | |
|
Never |
|
|
|
|
0.18 (0.09-0.34) | <.001 | |
Appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-rating results | .02 | |||||||
|
Not at all trustworthy (ref) | |||||||
|
Not trustworthy |
|
|
|
|
1.68 (1.01-2.84) | .06 | |
|
More or less trustworthy |
|
|
|
|
1.97 (1.17-3.33) | .01 | |
|
Somewhat trustworthy |
|
|
|
|
1.93 (1.12-3.31) | .02 | |
|
Very trustworthy |
|
|
|
|
1.16 (0.59-2.26) | .67 | |
Appraisal of the trustworthiness of narrative comments |
|
|
|
|
.09 | |||
|
Not at all trustworthy (ref) | |||||||
|
Not trustworthy |
|
|
|
|
2.11 (1.21-3.69) | .009 | |
|
More or less trustworthy |
|
|
|
|
1.89 (1.08-3.28) | .03 | |
|
Somewhat trustworthy |
|
|
|
|
1.97 (1.13-3.44) | .02 | |
|
Very trustworthy |
|
|
|
|
2.26 (1.22-4.19) | .01 |
a Model 1: Adjusted for demographics (age, gender, marital status, Internet use, medical specialty) (χ212=28,891, P=.004, Nagelkerke R2=.019).
b Model 2: Adjusted for demographics, jameda service product (χ213=50,980, P<.001, Nagelkerke R2=.034).
c Model 3: Adjusted for demographics, jameda service product, use of physician-rating websites, appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-rating results/narrative comments (χ226=251,463, P<.001, Nagelkerke R2=.160).