Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 19;18(9):e254. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5889

Table 6.

Multivariate regression analyses, including adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P values, of the association between the implementation of measures to increase patient satisfaction because of online ratings (both scaled-survey ratings and narrative comments) and independent variables.

Characteristics Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c

AOR (95% CI) P value AOR (95% CI) P value AOR (95% CI) P value
Age (years)   .57   .71   .85

<35 (ref)

36-45 0.76 (0.49-1.19) .23 0.77 (0.49-1.20) .24 0.85 (0.53-1.36) .50

46-55 0.77 (0.50-1.19) .24 0.80 (0.52-1.25) .33 0.91 (0.57-1.45) .69

56-65 0.75 (0.47-1.19) .22 0.79 (0.50-1.25) .32 0.90 (0.55-1.47) .67

≥66 0.57 (0.29-1.10) .10 0.63 (0.32-1.23) .18 0.70 (0.35-1.42) .32
Gender

Male (ref)






Female 1.21 (0.99-1.48) .07 1.16 (0.95-1.43) .15 1.09 (0.88-1.36) .43
Marital status   .38   .43   .55

Married (ref)






Widowed 1.94 (0.60-5.46) .21 1.99 (0.71-5.59) .20 1.32 (0.46-3.80) .61

Single 1.14 (0.86-1.50) .37 1.13 (0.85-1.49) .40 1.18 (0.88-1.59) .27

Divorced 1.20 (0.85-1.69) .31 1.15 (0.81-1.62) .44 1.20 (0.83-1.74) .34
Internet use   .70   .77   .21

Several times a day (ref)

Once a day 1.06 (0.72-1.56) .77 1.13 (0.76-1.66) .55 1.39 (0.92-2.10) .12

Less than once a day 0.82 (0.50-1.35) .44 0.91 (0.55-1.50) .71 1.29 (0.75-2.24) .36
Medical specialty   <.001   <.001   <.001

General practitioner (ref)

Specialist 1.31 (1.04-1.66) .03 1.16 (0.91-1.48) .23 1.17 (0.91-1.51) .23

Others 0.77 (0.55-1.08) .13 0.68 (0.48-0.96) .03 0.59 (0.41-0.85) .004
Jameda service product

Basic product (ref)

Any service product (eg, gold, silver, platinum)

1.61 (1.32-1.96) <.001 1.13 (0.90-1.41) .29
Use of physician-rating websites (frequency)



  <.001

At least once per day (ref)

Several times a week



1.39 (0.86-2.23) .18

Once per week



0.98 (0.63-1.51) .91

Once per month



0.59 (0.38-0.90) .01

Less frequently



0.39 (0.25-0.61) <.001

Never



0.18 (0.09-0.34) <.001
Appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-rating results .02

Not at all trustworthy (ref)

Not trustworthy



1.68 (1.01-2.84) .06

More or less trustworthy



1.97 (1.17-3.33) .01

Somewhat trustworthy



1.93 (1.12-3.31) .02

Very trustworthy



1.16 (0.59-2.26) .67
Appraisal of the trustworthiness of narrative comments



  .09

Not at all trustworthy (ref)

Not trustworthy



2.11 (1.21-3.69) .009

More or less trustworthy



1.89 (1.08-3.28) .03

Somewhat trustworthy



1.97 (1.13-3.44) .02

Very trustworthy



2.26 (1.22-4.19) .01

a Model 1: Adjusted for demographics (age, gender, marital status, Internet use, medical specialty) (χ212=28,891, P=.004, Nagelkerke R2=.019).

b Model 2: Adjusted for demographics, jameda service product (χ213=50,980, P<.001, Nagelkerke R2=.034).

c Model 3: Adjusted for demographics, jameda service product, use of physician-rating websites, appraisal of the trustworthiness of scaled-rating results/narrative comments (χ226=251,463, P<.001, Nagelkerke R2=.160).