Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;2016:6212684. doi: 10.1155/2016/6212684

Table 2.

Contribution of subview prediction (implicit training).

Dataset Method Sp (%) Se (%) GMean (%) Acc (%) AUC NPV = 95%
TPR (%) FPR (%)
DS1 Simple 91.74 73.25 81.97 86.40 0.9047 64.482 8.368
Subview 92.58 73.52 82.50 87.08 0.9149 71.202 9.239

DS2 Simple 91.73 76.51 83.77 87.30 0.9228 75.336 9.680
Subview 92.45 76.40 84.04 87.78 0.9318 80.983 10.405

DS3 Simple 89.30 74.65 81.64 85.10 0.9030 70.424 9.232
Subview 90.23 74.88 82.20 85.84 0.9112 74.256 9.735

DS4 Simple 87.31 82.30 84.77 84.49 0.9131 0 0
Subview 88.15 82.30 85.18 84.85 0.9192 0 0

DS5 Simple 85.80 82.18 83.97 83.79 0.9067 0 0
Subview 86.78 82.34 84.53 84.31 0.9135 0 0

DS6 Simple 86.98 81.30 84.09 83.90 0.9098 0 0
Subview 88.21 81.60 84.84 84.62 0.9168 0 0

DS7 Simple 83.71 80.09 81.88 81.89 0.8872 0.045 0.012
Subview 84.19 80.46 82.30 82.31 0.8943 0 0

DS8 Simple 83.53 80.40 81.95 81.87 0.8891 0.101 0.013
Subview 84.79 80.97 82.86 82.77 0.8962 0.032 0.004

DS9 Simple 87.07 71.34 78.81 82.51 0.8635 0 0
Subview 87.24 70.91 78.65 82.51 0.8733 0 0