Table 2.
Contribution of subview prediction (implicit training).
| Dataset | Method | Sp (%) | Se (%) | GMean (%) | Acc (%) | AUC | NPV = 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPR (%) | FPR (%) | |||||||
| DS1 | Simple | 91.74 | 73.25 | 81.97 | 86.40 | 0.9047 | 64.482 | 8.368 |
| Subview | 92.58 | 73.52 | 82.50 | 87.08 | 0.9149 | 71.202 | 9.239 | |
|
| ||||||||
| DS2 | Simple | 91.73 | 76.51 | 83.77 | 87.30 | 0.9228 | 75.336 | 9.680 |
| Subview | 92.45 | 76.40 | 84.04 | 87.78 | 0.9318 | 80.983 | 10.405 | |
|
| ||||||||
| DS3 | Simple | 89.30 | 74.65 | 81.64 | 85.10 | 0.9030 | 70.424 | 9.232 |
| Subview | 90.23 | 74.88 | 82.20 | 85.84 | 0.9112 | 74.256 | 9.735 | |
|
| ||||||||
| DS4 | Simple | 87.31 | 82.30 | 84.77 | 84.49 | 0.9131 | 0 | 0 |
| Subview | 88.15 | 82.30 | 85.18 | 84.85 | 0.9192 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| ||||||||
| DS5 | Simple | 85.80 | 82.18 | 83.97 | 83.79 | 0.9067 | 0 | 0 |
| Subview | 86.78 | 82.34 | 84.53 | 84.31 | 0.9135 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| ||||||||
| DS6 | Simple | 86.98 | 81.30 | 84.09 | 83.90 | 0.9098 | 0 | 0 |
| Subview | 88.21 | 81.60 | 84.84 | 84.62 | 0.9168 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| ||||||||
| DS7 | Simple | 83.71 | 80.09 | 81.88 | 81.89 | 0.8872 | 0.045 | 0.012 |
| Subview | 84.19 | 80.46 | 82.30 | 82.31 | 0.8943 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| ||||||||
| DS8 | Simple | 83.53 | 80.40 | 81.95 | 81.87 | 0.8891 | 0.101 | 0.013 |
| Subview | 84.79 | 80.97 | 82.86 | 82.77 | 0.8962 | 0.032 | 0.004 | |
|
| ||||||||
| DS9 | Simple | 87.07 | 71.34 | 78.81 | 82.51 | 0.8635 | 0 | 0 |
| Subview | 87.24 | 70.91 | 78.65 | 82.51 | 0.8733 | 0 | 0 | |