Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug;19(8):875–882.

Table 1.

Erythrogram variables in different experimental groups

Treatments

Parameters C EEP HS EEP + HS
TEC (106/mm3) 6.22± 0.32a 6.07± 0.54a 4.09±0.32b 5.13± 0.19ab
Hb (gm/dl) 16.00± 0.23a 15.11± 1.06a 10.60± 0.30b 12.60± 0.61b
Ht (%) 39.60± 0.83a 38.60± 1.80ab 31.06± 0.40c 35.00±1.73bc
MCV (fl) 63.89± 2.22b 64.07± 3.07b 76.60± 4.96a 68.09±1.31ab
MCHC (%) 40.41± 0.32a 39.06± 0.98a 34.10± 0.61b 36.01± 0.57b
Retics (%) 2.56± 0.23c 2.46± 0.24c 5.63± 0.34a 4.03± 0.14b

C: Control; EEP: ethanolic extract of propolis; HS: heat stress; TEC: Total erythrocytes counts; Hb: Hemoglobin; Ht: Hematocrit; MCV: Mean corpuscular volume; MCHC: Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration

Data are expressed as the mean±SE. Means within the same row carrying different superscripts are significantly different (one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test, P<0.05, n=5 /group)