Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 30;27(3):81–97. doi: 10.1294/jes.27.81

Table 3. Relationship between track condition and racing time at Kyoto Racetrack (1990–1994).

Racing distance (m) Track surface conditions
Firm Good Yielding Soft

Turf 1,200 71.6 ± 1.2 72.1 ± 0.9 72.0 ± 1.1 72.2 ± 1.0
(95/1,231) (20/261) (15/157) (3/49)
1,400 84.5 ± 1.2A,B 85.4 ± 1.2A 84.8 ± 1.0 86.0 ± 1.3B
(119/1,542) (15/201) (10/138) (6/88)
1,600 97.4 ± 1.4A 97.2 ± 1.0B 97.3 ± 1.1C 99.5 ± 1.5A,B,C
(119/2,328) (15/377) (10/86) (6/82)
1,800 110.5 ± 1.4 109.7 ± 1.3 110.4 ± 0.9 110.7 ± 0.1
(91/1,059) (16/206) (7/86) (3/38)
2,000 123.9 ± 2.0A 124.7 ± 1.5B 124.4 ± 1.7C 127.1 ± 1.3A,B,C
(144/1,419) (17/201) (16/191) (7/90)

Fast Good Muddy Sloppy

Dirt 1,200 74.7 ± 1.1A,B 73.8 ± 1.4A 73.8 ± 1.0B 74.4 ± 1.3
(210/2,421) (37/403) (43/582) (44/504)
1,400 87.5 ± 1.3A,B 86.6 ± 1.7A,c 86.6 ± 4.7B 87.3 ± 1.3c
(228/2,711) (36/406) (46/588) (37/450)
1,800 115.2 ± 1.6A,B,c 114.2 ± 1.6A,d 113.6 ± 1.3B,d,E 114.7 ± 1.5c,E
(324/3,490) (58/681) (71/790) (56/688)

Racing time(s) is expressed as the mean ± SD. Mean values with the same superscripts differ significantly (capital letters, P<0.01; lowercase letters, P<0.05; based on Student’s t-test following one-way ANOVA). Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of winners/number of runners (Reproduced from M. Oikawa, R. Kusunose, 2005, Vet. J., with permission from Elsevier Ltd.).