Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 30;3(10):740–751. doi: 10.1002/acn3.330

Table 2.

Discriminative power of CBF and CMRgl changes in AD and bvFTD

AUC (95% CI) Accuracy (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI)
CN versus AD
CBF 0.89 (0.76–1.00) 88% (77–100) 86% (64–100) 92% (75–100)
CMRgl 0.91 (0.77–1.00) 90% (76–100) 78% (44–100) 100%
CN versus bvFTD
CBF 0.83 (0.68–0.98) 83% (68–94) 78% (56–100) 92% (58–100)
CMRgl 0.85 (0.7–0.99) 87% (77–97) 79% (63–95) 100%
AD versus bvFTD
CBF 0.87 (0.75–0.99) 86% (73–94) 83% (61–100) 93% (64–100)
CMRgl 0.79 (0.57–1.00) 86% (71–96) 89% (68–00) 78% (33–100)

AUC, areas under the curve; CBF, cerebral blood flow.