Table 2.
Discriminative power of CBF and CMRgl changes in AD and bvFTD
AUC (95% CI) | Accuracy (95% CI) | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN versus AD | ||||
CBF | 0.89 (0.76–1.00) | 88% (77–100) | 86% (64–100) | 92% (75–100) |
CMRgl | 0.91 (0.77–1.00) | 90% (76–100) | 78% (44–100) | 100% |
CN versus bvFTD | ||||
CBF | 0.83 (0.68–0.98) | 83% (68–94) | 78% (56–100) | 92% (58–100) |
CMRgl | 0.85 (0.7–0.99) | 87% (77–97) | 79% (63–95) | 100% |
AD versus bvFTD | ||||
CBF | 0.87 (0.75–0.99) | 86% (73–94) | 83% (61–100) | 93% (64–100) |
CMRgl | 0.79 (0.57–1.00) | 86% (71–96) | 89% (68–00) | 78% (33–100) |
AUC, areas under the curve; CBF, cerebral blood flow.