Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016 Jul 29;31:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.07.015

Table 2.

Association of common LRRK2 variants with risk of clinical DLB and pathological high likelihood DLB

Clinical DLB patients vs. controls Pathological high likelihood DLB patients vs. controls Combined disease group vs. controls

Variant Amino acid MA MAF in patients (N=416) MAF in controls (N=1790) OR (95% CI) P-value MAF in patients (N=354) OR (95% CI) P-value MAF in patients (N=723) OR (95% CI) P-value
rs10878245 L153L T 39.1% 38.2% 1.04 (0.83, 1.30) 0.74 40.7% 1.11 (0.87, 1.41) 0.40 40.2% 1.09 (0.91, 1.30) 0.37
rs7308720 N551K G 5.5% 7.6% 0.73 (0.52, 1.03) 0.067 6.5% 0.85 (0.60, 1.19) 0.34 6.0% 0.78 (0.06, 1.02) 0.062
rs10878307 I723V G 8.3% 7.7% 1.07 (0.79, 1.45) 0.66 8.2% 1.01 (0.74, 1.39) 0.94 8.4% 1.07 (0.84, 1.36) 0.61
rs7966550 L953L C 11.4% 12.6% 0.89 (0.68, 1.16) 0.40 12.5% 1.03 (0.79, 1.35) 0.83 11.9% 0.95 (0.77, 1.17) 0.64
rs7133914 R1398H A 5.7% 7.4% 0.78 (0.55, 1.09) 0.14 6.9% 0.94 (0.68, 1.32) 0.73 6.2% 0.85 (0.65, 1.10) 0.22
rs11175964 K1423K A 5.5% 7.3% 0.78 (0.55, 1.09) 0.15 6.6% 0.91 (0.65, 1.27) 0.58 6.0% 0.83 (0.64, 1.08) 0.17
rs35507033 R1514Q A 1.2% 0.8% 1.72 (0.81, 3.65) 0.16 0.7% 0.91 (0.34, 2.39) 0.84 1.0% 1.29 (0.67, 2.50) 0.45
rs33958906 P1542S T 2.5% 2.8% 0.92 (0.56, 1.50) 0.73 3.0% 1.11 (0.68, 1.81) 0.67 2.8% 1.05 (0.72, 1.54) 0.80
rs1427263 G1624G C 35.0% 35.1% 1.07 (0.86, 1.34) 0.54 35.6% 0.96 (0.76, 1.21) 0.74 35.1% 0.99 (0.83, 1.19) 0.93
rs11176013 K1637K A 45.3% 45.1% 1.07 (0.84, 1.36) 0.59 45.2% 1.00 (0.78, 1.28) 0.99 45.2% 1.02 (0.84, 1.24) 0.82
rs35303786 M1646T C 1.1% 1.3% 0.88 (0.42, 1.84) 0.73 2.3% 1.92 (1.07, 3.45) 0.030 1.6% 1.32 (0.78, 2.21) 0.30
rs11564148 S1647T A 31.3% 30.4% 1.10 (0.88, 1.36) 0.42 30.1% 1.08 (0.86, 1.36) 0.50 30.4% 1.08 (0.90, 1.28) 0.42
rs10878371 G1819G T 45.4% 45.1% 1.07 (0.84, 1.36) 0.60 45.1% 1.00 (0.77, 1.28) 0.97 45.2% 1.02 (0.84, 1.24) 0.84
rs33995883 N2081D G 2.0% 1.9% 1.04 (0.59, 1.82) 0.89 2.5% 1.31 (0.76, 2.28) 0.33 2.3% 1.17 (0.75, 1.81) 0.49
rs10878405 E2108E A 31.6% 31.0% 1.05 (0.84, 1.31) 0.66 30.9% 1.03 (0.82, 1.29) 0.83 31.0% 1.02 (0.86, 1.22) 0.80
rs33962975 G2385G G 14.8% 14.1% 0.97 (0.76, 1.25) 0.82 13.6% 0.94 (0.72, 1.23) 0.65 14.3% 0.96 (0.79, 1.18) 0.70
rs3761863 M2397T T 34.4% 34.5% 1.08 (0.86, 1.35) 0.50 35.7% 1.08 (0.86, 1.37) 0.51 35.0% 1.07 (0.89, 1.27) 0.48
rs76904798 N/A1 T 13.7% 14.0% 0.91 (0.71, 1.17) 0.44 13.3% 0.93 (0.71, 1.22) 0.61 13.8% 0.96 (0.78, 1.17) 0.66

MA=minor allele; MAF=minor allele frequency; OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval. ORs, 95% CIs, and p-values result from logistic regression models adjusted for age (age at DLB onset in clinical DLB patients, age at death in pathological high likelihood DLB patients, and age at last follow-up in controls) and gender. Each LRRK2 variant was examined under a dominant model, and therefore ORs correspond to presence of the minor allele. After applying a single-step minP permutation adjustment for multiple testing, p-values ≤ 0.0037 (clinical DLB vs. controls), ≤ 0.0041 (pathological high likelihood DLB vs. controls), and ≤0.0040 (combined disease group vs. controls) were considered as statistically significant.

1

rs76904798 is not an exonic variant.