Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eval Program Plann. 2016 Jul 27;59:21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.07.004

Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics and Tests for Significance for Therapist Evaluation (Cohorts 5 and 6)

Variables Pre
Training
(n = 60)		 Post Training
(n = 58)		 Paired Sample t-test
Mean SD Mean SD t df p
TF-CBT EBPAS
Requirementsa 		3.07 1.03 3.00 1.25 0.43 57 0.669
TF-CBT EBPAS
Appeala 		3.35 0.63 3.50 0.58 −1.85 57 0.069
TF-CBT EBPAS
Opennessa 		3.40 0.55 3.58 0.56 −2.72 57 0.009
TF-CBT EBPAS
Divergencea 		0.98 0.59 1.02 0.73 −0.59 57 0.557
TF-CBT EBPAS
Totala 		3.21 0.50 3.26 0.55 −0.85 57 0.399
TF-CBT
Knowledge
Questionnaire -
Total Correctb 		9.50 2.95 9.88 1.90 −1.72 57 0.175
TF-CBT
Knowledge Test
- Total Correct c 		5.36 1.40 5.74 1.49 −1.38 57 0.092

Note.

TF-CBT EBPAS = Trauma focused cognitive behavioral therapy Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (Aarons., 2014)

TF-CBT Knowledge Questionnaire (Fitzgerald, 2012)

TF-CBT Knowledge Test (Woody, et al., 2015)

a

Measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0-not at all; 1-slight extent; 2-moderate extent; 3-great extent; 4-very great extent). Higher scores are indicative of more positive attitudes, implementation climate, and implementation leadership.

b

Total correct out of 17, (1-correct; 0-incorrect). Higher scores are associated with higher levels of knowledge.

c

Total correct out of 8, (1-correct; 0-incorrect). Higher scores associated with higher levels of knowledge