Table 1.
Comparison of the transcriptomic effects of different beneficial and pathogenic fungi on their hosts
Beneficial/pathogen | Host | Fungus | Association type | Trend | DEGa | Analysis | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beneficial | Perennial ryegrass | Epichloë festucae | Endophyte | Down | 38% | RNAseq | This study |
Beneficial | Rice | Glomus intraradices | Mycorrhiza | Up | 0.5% | Microarray | Güimil et al. (2005) |
Beneficial | Tomato | Funneliformis mosseae | Mycorrhiza | Up | 3% | RNAseq | Zouari et al. (2014) |
Beneficial | California poplar | Laccaria bicolor | Mycorrhiza | Variable | 0.8% | Microarray | Plett et al. (2015) |
Beneficial | Grapevine | Trichoderma harzianum | Endophyte | Up | 1% | Microarray | Perazzolli et al. (2012) |
Beneficial | Arabidopsis thaliana | Trichoderma harzianum | Endophyte | Up | <1% | Microarray | Morán‐Diez et al. (2012) |
Pathogen | Lettuce | Botrytis cinerea | Necrotroph | Up | 20% | RNAseq | De Cremer et al. (2013) |
Pathogen | Maize | Ustilago maydis | Biotroph | Up | 22% | Microarray | Doehlemann et al. (2008) |
Pathogen | Rice | Magnaporthe oryzae | Hemibiotroph | Up | 13% | RNAseq | Kawahara et al. (2012) |
DEG, the proportion of host differentially expressed genes.