Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 4;11(10):e0164072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164072

Fig 7. Serial Implicit Learning Task (SILT) results for accuracy and response time in HdhQ111/+ animals longitudinally.

Fig 7

A. S1 Accuracy. Animals were more accurate in responding into the central hole at shortest (2 second) stimulus length. B. S1 Response Time. Animals were faster to respond into the central hole at the shorter 0.5 second stimulus length. HdhQ111/+ animals were significantly slower to respond across all task manipulations in comparison to wild type animals. C. S2 Accuracy. HdhQ111/+ animals were significantly less accurate in comparison to wild type animals, although there was no interaction with time. D. S2 Response Time. Animals took significantly longer to respond at the shorter 0.5 second stimulus length and as the step size increased. HdhQ111/+ animals were significantly slower to respond than wild type animals when all testing conditions were considered. Data are shown for a total of 16 mice, 7 HdhQ111/+ and 9 wild type and is the average number of responses made over 5 days of testing at each stimulus length. Error bars represent ± standard error of the mean. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.