Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 May 12;25(10):1411–1417. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1281

Table 4.

Adjusted Odds Ratios for the Association Between EOC Risk and Body Powder by Menopausal Status and Hormone Therapy Use.

Pre-menopause Post-menopause

Exposure Cases (n=158) n (%) Controls (n=221) n (%) ORa 95% CI Cases (n=423) n (%) Controls (n=522) n (%) ORa 95% CI
Body Powder Useb
    Never use 59 (37.3) 103 (46.6) 1.00 Referent 157 (37.1) 247 (47.3) 1.00 Referent
    Only non-genital use 22 (13.9) 42 (19.0) 0.90 0.44, 1.84 97 (22.9) 98 (18.8) 1.49 1.04, 2.15
    Any genital use 77 (48.7) 76 (48.7) 1.50 0.87, 2.57 169 (40.0) 177 (33.9) 1.41 1.03, 1.92
HT Ever/Never Usec,d,e
HT Ever Use
    Never use 34 (32.1) 55 (48.7) 1.00 Referent
    Only non-genital use 23 (21.7) 23 (20.4) 1.74 0.77, 3.92
    Any genital use 49 (46.2) 35 (31.0) 2.68 1.33, 5.40
HT Never Use
    Never use 122 (38.9) 191 (46.9) 1.00 Referent
    Only non-genital use 73 (23.3) 75 (18.4) 1.51 0.99, 2.29
    Any genital use 119 (37.9) 141 (34.6) 1.24 0.87, 1.79

Abbreviations: epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC); hormone therapy (HT).

a

Adjusted for age at diagnosis/interview, study site, education, tubal ligation, parity, BMI, duration of OC use, first degree family history of breast or ovarian cancer, and interview year.

b

Test for interaction between menopausal status and route of body powder exposure was non-significant for only non-genital use (p=0.21) and any genital use (p=0.85) compared with never use.

c

Restricted to post-menopausal women.

d

Test for interaction between HT use and only non-genital use was non-significant (p=0.76).

e

Test for interaction between HT use and any genital use was non-significant (p=0.06).