Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2016 Aug 3;91:70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.006

Table 4.

Contacted any cancer control referral at 1-month follow-up by latent classes of unmet basic needs assessed at baseline; 2010–2012 Missouri 2-1-1

% contacted a referral OR (95% CI)
Latent classes of
unmet basic needs		 All Verbal
referral		 Tailored
reminder		 Navigator χ2
p-value		 Tailored reminder
vs. verbal referral		 Navigator vs.
verbal referral		 Navigator vs.
tailored reminder
C1 (n=292; 26.8%) 22.3% 12.1% 25.2% 30.2% 0.0083 2.45 (1.16–5.15) 3.14 (1.47–6.71) 1.28 (0.68–2.42)
C2 (n=228; 20.9%) 26.3% 18.8% 21.2% 39.2% 0.0088 1.16 (0.52–2.57) 2.78 (1.30–5.95) 2.40 (1.19–5.95)
C3 (n=561; 51.5%) 23.7% 19.3% 20.7% 31.1% 0.0131 1.09 (0.66–1.82) 1.89 (1.18–3.03) 1.73 (1.08–2.78)

Note. The number of participants assigned to latent classes does not equal 100% due to missing data

C1=Fewer needs; C2=Many needs; C3=Money needs