Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 5.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2015 Aug 28;26(5):1431–1440. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3949-z

Table 2.

Pooled analysis of the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography for diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis, based on 232 patients from 9 studies (6 independent cohorts).

Fibrosis Stage Optimal cut-
off (kPa)
AUROC
(95% CI)
Sensitivity (95%
CI)
Specificity Positive
LR
Negative
LR
Any Fibrosis (≥Stage 1) 2.88 0.86 (0.82–0.90) 0.75 (0.68–0.87) 0.77 (0.65–0.88) 3.24 0.33
Significant Fibrosis (≥Stage 2) 3.54 0.87 (0.82–0.93) 0.79 (0.76–0.90) 0.81 (0.72–0.91) 4.14 0.27
Advanced Fibrosis (≥Stage 3) 3.77 0.90 (0.84–0.94) 0.83 (0.53–0.90) 0.86 (0.81–0.96) 5.93 0.19
Cirrhosis (Stage 4) 4.09 0.91 (0.76–0.95) 0.88 (0.82–1.00) 0.87 (0.77–0.97) 6.50 0.14

[Abbreviations: AUROC-Area under receiver-operating curve, CI-Confidence intervals, LR-likelihood ratio]