Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 5.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2015 Aug 28;26(5):1431–1440. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3949-z

Table 3.

Subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Diagnostic performance of MRE, stratified by sex, presence or absence of obesity and degree of necroinflammatory activity, as well as on restricting to patients in whom the interval between MRE and liver biopsy was <1 year.

Categories Subgroups Fibrosis
Stage
AUROC Sensitivity Specificity Categories
Sex Males
(n=87)
≥1 0.88 (0.62–0.94) 0.84 0.77 Males vs. Females:
≥F1: 0.67
≥2 0.85 (0.79–0.93) 0.75 0.81 ≥F2: 0.71
≥3 0.96 (0.89–0.99) 0.87 0.94 ≥F3: 0.05
Stage 4 0.93 (0.79–0.97) 1.00 0.90 F4: 0.77
Females
(n=145)
≥1 0.85 (0.80–0.93) 0.72 0.85
≥2 0.88 (0.77–0.94) 0.82 0.84
≥3 0.88 (0.80–0.93) 0.82 0.83
Stage 4 0.90 (0.71–0.95) 0.84 0.85
Obesity BMI ≥30kg/m2
(obese)
(n=141)
≥1 0.85 (0.83–0.89) 0.68 0.83 Obese vs. non-obese
≥F1: 0.30
≥2 0.88 (0.85–0.96) 0.78 0.88 ≥F2: 0.51
≥3 0.90 (0.70–0.93) 0.86 0.84 ≥F3: 0.25
Stage 4 0.91 (0.75–0.94) 0.81 0.91 F4: 0.33
BMI <30kg/m2
(n=59)
≥1 0.79 (0.63–0.96) 0.68 0.86
≥2 0.84 (0.80–1.00) 0.75 0.79
≥3 0.97 (0.95–1.00) 0.89 0.96
Stage 4 0.98 (0.82–1.00) 1.00 0.91
Inflammation
grade
Absent-mild
(n=123)
≥1 0.84 (0.77–0.90) 0.77 0.78 Absent-mild inflammation
vs. moderate-severe
inflammation
≥F1: 0.70
≥2 0.89 (0.79–0.96) 0.82 0.87 ≥F2: 0.65
≥3 0.90 (0.82–0.96) 0.94 0.82 ≥F3: 0.83
Stage 4 0.95 (0.87–0.99) 0.91 0.90 F4: 0.56
Moderate-severe
(n=97)
≥1 0.87 (0.84–1.00) 0.71 0.90
≥2 0.86 (0.84–0.95) 0.76 0.84
≥3 0.91 (0.73–0.93) 0.91 0.82
Stage 4 0.91 (0.76–0.93) 0.90 0.89
Sensitivity Analysis
Interval
between
MRE and
liver biopsy
<1 year
(n=219)
≥1 0.85 (0.79–0.88) 0.73 0.80 N/A
≥2 0.87 (0.83–0.94) 0.79 0.86
≥3 0.91 (0.84–0.95) 0.92 0.82
Stage 4 0.93 (0.82–0.96) 0.91 0.87
*

Represents the comparison of diagnostic performance of MRE between subgroups (males vs. females, obese vs. non-obese, none-mild vs. moderate-severe inflammation) for each corresponding fibrosis stage (any, significant, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis). To compare the difference of AUROCs between subgroups, we used the interaction test proposed by Altman and Bland for comparisons with two estimates.

Please note that numbers in subgroups may not add up to 232 due to missing data in individual studies