Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 22;6(9):e011024. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011024

TableĀ 1.

Risk of bias

Reference Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Was self harm repetition ascertained via interview or hospital records (or some other objectively recorded method) Outcome assessor (for self harm outcome) blinded? Drop-out rate >15% for self harm data ITT analysis performed
Problem focused
Bannan38 Coin toss N Not described NA N N
Gibbons et al39 Not described Not described Hospital records Y Unclear Not described
Hatcher et al40 Computer generated Y Both Y N Y
Hawton et al41 Not described Not described Both Y Y N
Husain et al42 Computer generated Y Interview Y N Not described
McAuliffe et al43 Computer generated Y Interview Not described Y Not described
McLeavey et al44 Not described Not described GP questionnaire and hospital records Y Unclear Not described
Patsiokas and Clum45 Not described Not described Self harm outcomes not collected NA Unclear Not described
Stewart et al46 Drawing of lots Not described Hospital records N Y N
Salkovskis et al47 Not described Not described Hospital records Not described Unclear Not described
CBT
Brown et al48 Computer generated Not described Interview N Y Y
Evans et al49 Not described Y Both Y N N
Liberman and Eckman50 Not described Not described Interview Not described N Not described
Morley et al51 Not described Not described Interview Y Y Y
Rudd et al52 Computer generated Not described Interview Y Y Y
Slee et al53 Computer generated Y Interview N N Not described
Tyrer et al54 Computer generated Y Both Not described N Not described
Psychodynamic
Guthrie et al55 Not described Not described Both Y Y Y
Complex interventions with outreach
Allard et al56 Not described Y Both Not described Y Y
Clarke et al57 Random numbered lists Y Hospital records Not described N Not described
Comtois et al58 Computer generated N Interview Y Y Y
Hatcher et al59 Computer generated Y Hospital records Y N Y
Hatcher et al60 Computer generated Y Hospital records Y Y Y
Hawton et al61 Not described Not described Both Y N Not described
Hvid et al62 Not described Y Hospital records Y N Y
Kawanishi et al63 Computer generated Y Interview Y Y Y
Marasinghe et al64 Not described Not described Not described Y Unclear Y
Morthorst et al65 Not described Y Hospital records Y N Y
Litman and Wold66 Table of random numbers Not described Not described Not described Unclear Not described
Van der Sande et al67 Computer generated Y Hospital records N Y Y
Van Heeringen et al68 Not described Not described Interview including GP interview and check of death records Not described Y Not described
Wei et al69 Computer generated Not described Interview Not described Y Y
Welu70 Table of random numbers Not described Both Not described Unclear Not described
Other-psychological
Dubois et al71 Not described Not described Interview Not described N Not described
Gysin-Maillart et al72 Shuffling Y Self-report questionnaire and hospital records and contact with GPs and therapists N N Y
Tapolaa et al73 Not described Not described Interview N N Not described
Torhorst et al74 Not described Not described Interview Not described N Not described
Torhorst et al75 Not described Not described Not described Not described Y Not described
Other-psychosocial
Armitage et al76 Computer generated N Self-report questionnaire N Y Y
Crawford et al77 Not described Y Both Y N Not described
Grimholt et al78 Computer generated Y Self-report questionnaire and hospital records Blind in 70% of cases Y Y
Mouaffak et al79 Not described Y Both Not described N Y
O'Connor et al80 Not described Not described Self harm outcomes not collected NA Y N
Wang et al81 Not described Y National suicide prevention reporting sheets Not described N N
Waterhouse and Platt82 Not described Y Interview and questionnaire with GP, and review of case records N Y Not described

GP, general practice; ITT, intent-to-treat.