Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 29;6(9):e011467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011467

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis: factors associated with the propensity of GPs to screen asymptomatic men for prostate cancer

Factors Propensity to screen N (%) Unadjusted OR (95% CI) p Value Adjusted OR (95% CI) p Value
GP characteristics
Age group
 <40 16/47 (34.0) 1 1
 40–60 59/115 (51.3) 2.04 (1.01 to 4.13) 0.02** 1.09 (0.33 to 3.62) 0.88
 >60 22/34 (64.7) 3.55 (1.41 to 8.97) 1.82 (0.32 to 10.42) 0.50
Gender
 Male 64/128 (50.0) 1.06 (0.59 to 1.91) 0.85
 Female 33/68 (48.5) 1
Length of practice (years)
 ≤10 25/70 (35.7) 1 0.03** 1 0.11
 11–20 43/79 (54.4) 2.15 (1.11 to 4.16) 2.44 (0.82 to 7.23) 0.41
 21–30 19/30 (63.3) 3.11 (1.28 to 7.56) 1.81 (0.44 to 7.47) 0.68
 >30 10/17 (58.8) 2.57 (0.87 to 7.59) 1.49 (0.23 to 9.54
Knowledge
PPV of PSA
 <30% (correct) 29/54 (53.7) 1 0.55
 Overestimate 61/124 (49.2) 0.55 (0.19 to 1.63)
 Not sure 7/18 (38.9) 0.66 (0.24 to 1.81)
PPV of DRE
 <30% (correct) 24/50 (48.0) 1 0.61
 Overestimate 58/111 (52.2) 0.81 (0.34 to 1.94)
 Not sure 15/35 (42.8) 0.69 (0.32 to 1.47)
PPV of PSA and DRE
 <50% (correct) 25/47 (53.2) 1 0.74
 Overestimate 62/126 (49.2) 0.68 (0.25 to 1.85)
 Not sure 10/23 (43.4) 0.79 (0.32 to 1.94)
Consider having a PSA test yourself*
No 2/13 (15.4) 1 0.01** 1 0.017**
Yes 65/115 (56.5) 7.3 (1.55 to 34.43) 6.88 (1.40 to 33.73)

*Among male participants.

**p<0.05.

GPs, general practitioners; DRE, digital rectal examination; PSA, prostrate-specific antigen; PPV, positive predictive value.