Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 21;6(9):e012518. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012518

Table 1.

Criteria for assessing data quality

Quality level Criteria
Method for exposure measurement
 High Urinary sodium excretion by 24-hour urine collection and high quality of urine collection
 Low Urine spot test or questionnaire
 Unclear Insufficient information to permit judgement
Method and setting for measurement of outcome
 High Measured multiple times, by trained professional and using standardised procedures. If measured by oscillometric method, the device is clinically validated.
 Low Otherwise (if not all criteria mentioned above are met)
 Unclear Insufficient information to permit judgement
External validity
 High Characteristics of study population are relatively representative of, and generalizable to, the general population
 Low Characteristics of study population are present in only a specific part of the population (eg, hypertensive children, obese children, etc)
 Unclear Insufficient information to permit judgement
Reporting
 High Complete report and if applicable trial registration
 Low Incomplete report (eg, not all prespecific primary outcomes are reported), source of financial support is missing or impartial
 Unclear Insufficient information to permit judgement