Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 30;21(3):187–193. doi: 10.15430/JCP.2016.21.3.187

Table 2.

Comparison of AUC values of training data set for single/combined marker(s) using logistic regression

Marker AUC Probability Sensitivity at 94% specificity (%) Cutoff at 94% specificity
HE4 0.821 5.04E-51 51.43 0.1094199
CEA 0.753 1.78E-32 33.21 0.6434527
RANTES 0.858 1.02E-62 2.86 5.076444
ApoA2 0.867 4.98E-66 0.71 5.60206
TTR 0.83 1.20E-53 1.43 5.630428
sVCAM-1 0.552 0.0074418 6.07 3.161243
CEA, HE4 0.855 6.12E-62 55.00 0.5850375
RANTES, ApoA1, TTR, sVCAM-1 0.964 2.88E-104 84.29 0.4779614
CEA, HE4, RANTES, ApoA2, TTR, sVCAM-1 0.983 2.03E-112 92.50 0.357278
CEA, HE4, RANTES, ApoA2, TTR, sVCAM-1, age 0.986 3.68E-114 93.21 0.3700928

AUC, the area under the curve; HE4, human epididymis secretory protein 4; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; RANTES, regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted; ApoA2, apolipoprotein A2; TTR, transthyretin; sVCAM-1, secretory vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.