Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 30;21(3):187–193. doi: 10.15430/JCP.2016.21.3.187

Table 3.

Comparison of AUC values of test data set for single/combined marker(s) using logistic regression

Marker AUC Probability Cutoff from training Specificity at the cutoff (%) Sensitivity at the cutoff (%)
HE4 0.842 2.25E-13 0.1094199 89.33 57.53
CEA 0.681 6.60E-05 0.6434527 94.67 28.77
RANTES 0.829 1.83E-12 5.076444 92.00 0.00
ApoA2 0.828 1.97E-12 5.60206 90.67 1.37
TTR 0.791 3.89E-10 5.630428 92.00 4.11
sVCAM-1 0.698 1.48E-05 3.161243 82.67 5.48
CEA, HE4 0.841 2.66E-13 0.5850375 86.67 57.33
RANTES, ApoA1, TTR, sVCAM-1 0.942 4.47E-21 0.4779614 89.33 77.33
CEA, HE4, RANTES, ApoA2, TTR, sVCAM-1 0.985 5.26E-25 0.357278 90.67 94.67
CEA, HE4, RANTES, ApoA2, TTR, sVCAM-1, age 0.988 2.71E-25 0.3700928 93.33 92.00

AUC, the area under the curve; HE4, human epididymis secretory protein 4; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; RANTES, regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted; ApoA2, apolipoprotein A2; TTR, transthyretin; sVCAM-1, secretory vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.