Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 30;3(2):75–80. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.069

Table 2.

Comparison of intubation time

DT (sec) TT (sec) FVT (sec) TT-DT (sec) FVT-TT (sec)
i-gel 3.1 (2.3–4.9) 10.5 (8.0–14.0) 17.2 (13.2–21.0) 7.0 (4.0–9.8) 6.3 (3.0–8.0)
Air-Q 5.0 (3.1–7.0) 15.0 (10.0–19.2) 15.8 (10.2–24.0) 9.6 (6.0–13.0) 3.9 (2.3–7.0)
LMA Fastrach 8.0 (5.0–10.0) 20.0 (14.0–26.0) 27.6 (21.0–34.0) 12.0 (6.0–13.0) 7.0 (3.9–10.0)
MCL 4.8 (3.2–6.5) 12.6 (10.3–15.5) 22.0 (18.6–25.4) 7.3 (5.0–10.0) 9.8 (6.9–11.8)
P-value < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
P-valuea)
i-gel vs. Air-Q < 0.001 < 0.001 0.03 0.001 < 0.001
i-gel vs. LMA Fastrach < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.354
i-gel vs. MCL < 0.001 0.002 < 0.001 0.05 0.001
Air-Q vs. LMA Fastrach < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.02 < 0.001
Air-Q vs. MCL 0.73 0.1 < 0.001 0.04 < 0.001
LMA Fastrach vs. MCL < 0.001 < 0.001 0.001 < 0.001 0.007

Continuous variables are given as median (interquartile range). The intubation time from first intubation attempt only is used for analysis. P-value was calculated by Friedman test and P<0.05 is considered significant.

DT, device insertion time; TT, tube insertion time; FVT, first ventilation time; MCL, Macintosh laryngoscope.

a)

Calculated by Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni correction in post hoc analysis. P<0.0083 is considered significant.