Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 5;2(10):e1501694. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501694

Table 3. The phenology and arrival success of eels leaving European catchments.

The proportion of eels arriving by peak spawning and 90% spawning was calculated using observed swimming speeds. The required average travel speed for 50% of eels to arrive by peak spawning was modeled by incrementing the observed speeds at intervals (1 km day−1) and recalculating. The percentage of eels arriving in time for the second spawning opportunity was calculated from observed migration speeds and represents the percentage arriving after the first spawning period has ended, and by 90% of the next. NA, not applicable.

Departure
(day of year)
Time to peak
spawning (day)
Peak
spawning
90%
spawning
Required speed
(km day−1)
Second
spawning
All catchments 288 130 5 12 45.9 65
Imsa, Norway 281 137 4 12 46.3 66
Dee, Scotland 246 172 12 23 43.1 61
Lower Bann, Ireland 276 142 10 21 33.8 65
Windermere, U.K. 293 125 8 16 36.3 65
Schwentine River 283 135 3 7 44.1 60
Burrishoole, Ireland 336 82 9 21 NA 66
Shannon, Ireland 307 111 2 9 36.3 74
Oir, France 355 63 3 12 NA 71
Fremur, France 309 109 1 5 44.1 71
Loire, France 317 101 3 12 NA 71
Fume morte, Spain 312 106 3 6 45.1 60
Nive, France 293 125 2 12 NA 71
Gudena, Denmark 268 150 3 7 45.1 68
Ulla, Spain 247 171 10 21 NA 67
Halselva, Norway 223 195 4 12 38.6 62
ICES 41G2, Sweden 296 122 2 7 41.3 64
ICES 40G4, Sweden 258 160 3 9 NA 62
ICES 42G6, Sweden 293 125 5 12 45.1 60
ICES 45G6, Sweden 333 85 7 15 41.3 58
Warnow, German 209 209 5 11 37.8 59