Table 4.

Effects of ointment formulations from M. annua and T. purpurea on hydroxyproline and protein content of tissues with burn wound in rats

Groups	Hydroxyproline content (mg/g tissue)	Protein content (mg/g tissue)
S ilver Sulphadiazine Ointment	72.29 ± 2.35*	88.91 ± 2.59*
Control (Base)	41.27 ± 1.57	50.62 ± 1.58
TPF-A Ointment (5% w/w)	63.54 ± 2.40*	72.40 ± 2.14*
MAF-C Ointment (5% w/w)	71.65 ± 2.69*	85.57 ± 3.64*
PONG Ointment (0.2% w/w)	45.41 ± 1.27	55.43 ± 1.86
PONG Ointment(0.5% w/w)	50.95 ± 1.20*	61.71 ± 2.25*
LUT Ointment (0.2% w/w)	46.28 ± 1.34	52.38 ± 1.68
LUT Ointment (0.5% w/w)	52.10 ± 1.92*	66.24 ± 1.52*

Values represents Mean ± S.D. (n = 6).

^* p<0.01, when each treated group was compared with control and reference group.