Table 5.
Effects of ointment formulations from M. annua and T. purpurea on enzymatic and non-enzymatic level of tissues with burn wound in rats.
| Groups |
Enzymatic and non-enzymatic assay
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| SOD (μg/50 mg tissue) | CAT (μmol/50 mg tissue) | GSH (μmol/50 mg tissue) | |
| Control (Base) | 20.52 ± 1.05 | 25.24 ± 1.27 | 23.31 ± 0.85 |
| TPF-A Ointment (5% w/w) | 37.64 ± 1.32* | 48.23 ± 1.86* | 41.76 ± 1.34* |
| MAF-C Ointment (5% w/w) | 39.12 ± 1.78* | 46.17 ± 1.87* | 45.69 ± 1.25* |
| PONG Ointment (0.2% w/w) | 24.09 ± 0.94 | 26.34 ± 1.08 | 26.38 ± 0.76 |
| PONG Ointment (0.5% w/w) | 30.27 ± 1.21* | 38.92 ± 1.27* | 35.17 ± 1.28* |
| LUT Ointment (0.2% w/w) | 23.61 ± 1.23 | 28.42 ± 0.94 | 28.20 ± 1.64 |
| LUT Ointment (0.5% w/w) | 28.28 ± 1.34* | 36.16 ± 1.54* | 37.64 ± 1.39* |
| Silver Sulphadiazine Ointment | 38.28 ± 1.55* | 50.38 ± 1.65* | 46.88 ± 1.75* |
Values represents Mean ± S.D. (n = 6).
*
p<0.01, when each treated group was compared with control and reference group.