Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep;32(5):570–577. doi: 10.6515/ACS20151013G

Table 2. Analysis of drug-eluting stents (XIENCE V; TAXUS; CYPHER) compared to a bare metal stent (VISION).

BMS (n = 56) DES (n = 146) p value
Angiography
 Baseline reference mean diameter (mm) 2.75 ± 0.19 2.79 ± 0.18 0.118
 Balloon size (mm) 3.17 ± 0.07 3.22 ± 0.18 0.732
 Balloon: artery ratio 1.16 ± 0.09 1.15 ± 0.09 0.923
 Stent: artery ratio 1.13 ± 0.03 1.12 ± 0.04 0.065
Histology*
 Endothelialization (%) 99.11 ± 1.99 96.84 ± 6.60 0.012
 IEL (mm2) 6.18 ± 0.68 6.97 ± 0.95 0.001
 Lumen area (mm2) 3.86 ± 1.72 4.73 ± 1.58 0.001
 Neointima area (mm2) 2.32 ± 1.26 1.98 ± 1.30 0.117
 Mean neointimal thickness (mm) 0.32 ± 0.25 0.22 ± 0.22 0.011
 Area stenosis (%) 39.10 ± 23.37 29.88 ± 19.32 0.009
 Injury score 0.67 ± 0.44 0.99 ± 0.79 0.004
 Inflammation score 0.64 ± 0.98 2.09 ± 1.54 < 0.001
 Number of slides with the presence of para-strut granuloma formation 3 (2%) 50 (34%) < 0.001

BMS, bare metal stent; DES, drug-eluting stent; IEL, internal elastic lamina.

* 28 days of follow-up.