Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 5;371(1707):20150499. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0499

Table 1.

Comparison of imaging techniques. TIRF, total internal reflection fluorescence; HILO, highly inclined laminated optical sheet; STED, stimulated emission depletion; SIM, structured illumination microscopy; PALM, photoactivation localization microscopy; STORM, stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. For references, see text.

diffraction-limited
super-resolution
wide-field confocal TIRF HILO STED SIM PALM/STORM
lateral resolution x, y (nm) 200–250 180–250 200–250 200–250 ∼50 ∼50–100 ∼10–20
axial resolution z (nm) 500–700 500–700 ∼100 500–700 ∼20–100 ∼200–300 ∼20–100
limitations poor contrast weaker intensity surface only uncertain depth high phototoxicity data processing, image reconstruction artefacts slow, data processing
advantages fast, sensitive optical sectioning fast, sensitive high contrast fast, no data processing all probes highest resolution