Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 30;1(1):8–18. doi: 10.15441/ceem.14.029

Table 1.

Representative topical agents and burn dressings for partial thickness burns

Description Advantage Disadvantage
Topical agents
 Triple antibiotic ointment/bacitracin Topical antimicrobial ointment Inexpensive, painless, maintains moist environment Requires frequent daily applications, messy, does not penetrate eschar
 Silver sulfadiazine Water based cream containing silver salt Wide antimicrobial coverage, painless Delays healing, stains tissues, contains sulfa, may cause leukopenia
 Mafenide acetate Water based cream Penetrates eschar, wide antibacterial coverage, can be used on face May be painful to apply, associated with metabolic acidosis
Advanced dressings
 Mepilex Ag Silver impregnated, silicone coated foam May be left for 7 days, absorptive, broad antimicrobial coverage, comfortable, easy to remove Expensive, do not use with magnetic resonance imaging
 Aquacel Ag Nylon, silver impregnated dressing May be left for 7 days, broad antimicrobial coverage, painless Expensive, not compatible with oil-based products
 Duoderm Hydrocolloid May be left for 7 days, painless, facilitates autolytic debridement Not for large, heavily exudating burns
 Mepitel Silicone May be left for up to 14 days, painless Expensive, non absorptive, no antimicrobial activity