Table 3. Evaluation of the interfaces predicted by our method.

Model interfaces are evaluated with respect to the PDB structures: IS-score < 0.12, ‘incorrect’; 0.12 < IS-score < 0.17, ‘acceptable’; 0.17 < IS-score, ‘correct’.

PDB code	PDB, interface	Model	Model, interface	IS-score	Result
3cre	AB	3cre model	AB	0.83	Correct
	BC		BC	0.80	Correct
4a6j	AC	4a6j trimer model	AB	0.21	Correct
			BC	0.14	Acceptable
		4a6j tetramer model	AB	0.14	Acceptable
			BC	0.20	Correct
			CD	0.12	Acceptable
4aod	AB	4aod model	AB	0.38	Correct
			BC	0.34	Correct
			CD	0.38	Correct
			DE	0.33	Correct
			EA	0.35	Correct
3se9	GH	3se9 model	GH	0.14	Acceptable
	HL		HL	0.33	Correct
3iyf	AB	3iyf model	AH	0.24	Correct
			HG	—	—
			GD	0.37	Correct
			DF	0.27	Correct
			FE	0.33	Correct
			EC	0.26	Correct
			CB	0.37	Correct
			BA	0.28	Correct
1e9r	AB	1e9r model	AB	0.70	Correct
			BC	0.69	Correct
			CD	0.71	Correct
			DE	0.71	Correct
			EF	0.67	Correct
			FA	—	—
3dvl	AB	3dvl model	AB	0.41	Correct
			BC	0.42	Correct
			CD	0.39	Correct
			DE	0.46	Correct
			EF	0.51	Correct
			FA	0.41	Correct
1gc1	GH	1gc1 model	GB	0.1925	Correct
	HL		BA	0.5326	Correct
	GC		GC	0.7067	Correct
	GC	m36 model	AC	0.7701	Correct