Table 4. Assembly-construction results of three methods in our benchmark set.

A comparison of the performance of our method, MultiFit and fitting structures into segments obtained by Segger is shown. Correlation is calculated using Chimera. IS-score gives the evaluation of interfaces predicted with respect to the PDB structures, and the r.m.s.d. of models is also shown. If MultiFit could not predict a structure or Segger could not segment the density map properly, the result is shown as ‘—’.

		Our method			MultiFit			Fitting structures into segments obtained by Segger
EMDB ID	PDB code	Correlation	IS-score results	R.m.s.d. (Å)	Correlation	IS-score results	R.m.s.d. (Å)	Correlation	IS-score results	R.m.s.d. (Å)
1494	3cre	0.79	2 correct	4.92	0.76	2 incorrect	22.46	—
1980	4a6j	0.59	1 correct, 1 acceptable	3.83	0.68	1 correct, 1 incorrect	3.20	—
1980	4a6j	0.51	1 correct, 2 acceptable	4.16	—			—
2055	4aod	0.89	5 correct	2.16	—			0.85	5 incorrect	5.07
2427	3se9	0.84	1 correct, 1 acceptable	4.64	0.84	1 incorrect, 1 no interface	16.14	—
5140	3iyf	0.78	7 correct, 1 no interface	7.35	—			0.86	2 correct, 6 no interface	30.31
5505	1e9r	0.84	5 correct, 1 no interface	2.44	0.91	6 incorrect	27.40	—
5672	3dvl	0.96	6 correct	1.86	0.79	6 correct	2.34	—