Table 5. Assembly-construction results in the MultiFit benchmark set.
The performances of MultiFit and our method are given. The number of subunits in the complexes is given. The r.m.s.d. of models with respect to the PDB structures and the correlations calculated using Chimera are shown.
| MultiFit | Our method | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDB code | Structure | R.m.s.d. (Å) | I.r.m.s.d. (Å) | Correlation | R.m.s.d. (Å) | I.r.m.s.d. (Å) | Correlation |
| 7cat | Dimer | 4.13 | 4.55 | 0.92 | 0.36 | 1.24 | 0.91 |
| 1gte | Dimer | 3.28 | 4.96 | 0.92 | 0.56 | 1.05 | 0.92 |
| 1qu9 | Trimer | 0.90 | 1.69 | 0.98 | 0.50 | 1.25 | 0.98 |
| 1urz | Trimer | 0.98 | 1.58 | 0.98 | 0.74 | 1.76 | 0.98 |
| 1z5s | Tetramer | 4.62 | 4.29 | 0.86 | 1.68 | 2.10 | 0.97 |
| 1e6v | Hexamer | 2.88 | 7.28 | 0.93 | 0.70 | 1.26 | 0.99 |
| 1mty | Hexamer | 2.08 | 3.42 | 0.98 | 0.81 | 1.38 | 0.99 |
| 1tyq | Heptamer | 3.31 | 8.90 | 0.85 | 1.31 | 2.23 | 0.98 |
| 1oel | Heptamer | 2.40 | 3.99 | 0.97 | 1.03 | 2.36 | 0.98 |
| 1gru | Heptamer | 3.36 | 6.1 | 0.81 | 1.15 | 1.58 | 0.98 |