Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 5;16:551. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1778-7

Table 4.

Associations among total hip replacement indicators within the years 2008 and 2009

quality indicator number
qi3aa qi3b qi3c qi3e qi6 qi3d qi2b qi4b qi5b qi5c qi5d
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Quality indicator number Quality
Indicator
Name (indicator type)
Year
qi3a Complication register (Sb) 2008
2009
qi3b Appointment within 6 weeks (S) 2008 \
2009 19.97
(0.00)c
qi3c Orthopaedic register form (S) 2008 0.57
(0.45)
\
2009 0.43
(0.51)
0.09
(0.77)
qi3e Improvement plan (S) 2008 0.29
(0.59)
\ 0.13
(0.71)
2009 0.28
(0.60)
4.38
(1.00)
0.13
(0.71)
qi6 Countrywide
implementation (S)
2008 1.41
(0.24)
\ 0.20
(0.66)
0.10
(0.75)
2009 0.43
(0.51)
0.09
(0.77)
0.18
(0.67)
0.13
(0.71)
INDEPENDENT T-TEST SPEARMAN CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
qi3d Complication meeting (S) 2008 yes 11 \ yes 10.5 yes 11 yes 10.8
no 8.2
(0.41) d,e
no 13
(0.81)
no 0
(0.01)
no 8.0
(0.73)
2009 yes 11.3 yes 11.4 yes 11.7 yes 11.7 yes 11.6
no 13.1
(0.86)
no 12
(0.98)
no 4.5
(0.19)
no 4.7
(0.19)
no 7
(0.74)
qi2b Thrombosis prophylaxis (P) 2008 yes 99.9 \ yes 60 yes 99.9 yes 99.9 0.09
(0.50)f
no 100
(0.73)
no 100
(0.80)
no 100
(0.86)
no 100
(0.83)
2009 yes 99.9 yes 99.8 yes 99.8 yes 99.8 yes 99.8 0.21
(0.04)
no 98.9
(0.19)
no 98.9
(0.18)
no 99.8
(0.89)
no 99.4
(0.52)
no 100
(0.65)
qi4b Transfusion of homologous blood (P) 2008 yes 90.7 \ yes 91 yes 99.1 yes 90.9 -0.16
(0.26)
0.08
(0.58)
no 98.4
(0.09)
no 90.7
(0.98)
no 100
(0.09)
no 97.4
(0.12)
2009 yes 91.8 yes 91.5 yes 92 yes 91.8 yes 91.5 0.01 (0.91) 0.17
(0.12)
no 89.3
(0.57)
no 94.1
(0.70)
no 82.9
(0.26)
no 75.8
(0.17)
no 93.6
(0.55)
qi5b Perioperative antibiotics (P) 2008 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
2009 yes 99.7 yes 99.6 yes 99.6 yes 99.7 yes 99.6 0.15
(0.16)
0.27
(0.01)
0.15
(0.17)
no 99.2
(0.60)
no 100
(0.07)
no 100
(0.06)
no 97.8
(0.39)
no 100
(0.06)
qi5c Antibiotics 60–15 min (P) 2008 yes 97.1 \ \ yes 99 yes 97.2 0.15
(0.26)
-0.04
(0.79)
-0.11
(0.45)
\
no 100
( 0.29)
no 50
(0.51)
no 100
(0.74)
2009 yes 98 yes 98 yes 98.4 yes 98 yes 97.9 0.10
(0.32)
0.28
(0.01)
0.12
(0.25)
0.46
(0.00)
no 99
(0.57)
no 100
(0.04)
no 88.5
(0.28)
no 100
(0.03)
no 100
(0.03)
qi5d Wound infections (O) 2008 yes 0.8 \ yes 0.8 yes 0.84 yes 0.8 0.12
(0.39)
-0.03
(0.84)
-0.28
(0.05)
\ 0.20
(0.14)
no 1.0
(0.74)
no 1.0
(0.60)
no 0.44
(0.26)
no 0.3
(0.17)
2009 yes 0.01 yes 0.01 yes 0.01 yes 0.01 yes 0.01 0.01
(0.91)
-0.04
(0.71)
-0.19
(0.07)
-0.03
(0.74)
0.04
(0.74)
no 0.01
(0.43)
no 0.02
(0.001)
no 0.0
(0.42)
no 0.01
(0.72)
no 0.01
(0.89)

a numbers indicate indicator numbers according to vertical indicator numbering

b S = structure, P = process, O = outcome

c x2 test (p-value)

d t-test: mean group 1, 2 (p-value)

e Interpretation: Of hospitals having an complication register, 11 % reported to hold complication meetings, compared to 8,2 % of those who do not have an complication register (p-value = 0.41)

f Spearman correlation coefficient (p-value)

bold numbers indicate significance