Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 18;19(5):1044–1061. doi: 10.1111/hex.12394

Table 5.

The total number of each network member placed in the network elicitation diagram per category of importance

Most important category (inner circle) Important category (middle circle) Less important category (outer circle)
Children 18 Friend 20 Friend 20
Partner 15 Work colleague 13 Niece/nephew 6
Friend 13 Neighbour 12 Niece/nephew‐in‐law 4
Sibling 12 Children 9 Nurse 3
Grandchildren 10 GP/doctor 8 Work colleague 3
Pets 8 Specialist/surgeon 5 Sibling 3
GP/Doctor 7 Grandchildren 4 Cousin 3
Parent (mother n = 6, father n = 1) 7 Mother 3 Grand‐nephew 3
Children‐in‐law 5 Sibling 3 Pharmacist 2
Nurse 4 Partner 3 Neighbour 2
Hospital 2 Nurse 3 Podiatrist 2
Step‐children 1 Children‐in‐law 2 Sibling‐in‐law 2
Ex‐wife 1 Cousin 2 Children 2
Parent‐in‐law 2 Aunt 1 Herbalist 1
Podiatrist 1 Cousin‐in‐law 1 Dog 1
Alternative therapist 1 Organizer 1 Staff at GP surgery 1
Friend (deceased) 1 Specialist clinic 1 Church group 1
Counsellor 1 GP 1
Cousin 1 Organization 1