Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 23;19(3):283–291. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.283

Table 4. Comparison on histopathology characteristics between cases diagnosed in study population and all cases S-D aged 50–69 years diagnosed in period 2004–2006 in province of Modena.

Characteristic Cases by population in study (n = 366)
No. (%)
All cases S-D diagnosed in period 2004–2006 by MCR (n = 905)
No. (%)
p-value
Tumor diameter (mm)* 13 ± 2 12 ± 1 0.790
Missing value (%) 9.3 16.3
T stage 0.029
 Tis 57 (15.6) 195 (21.5)
 T1 mic-a-b 124 (33.9) 320 (35.4)
 T1c 131 (35.8) 301 (33.3)
 T2 44 (12.0) 65 (7.2)
 T3–T4 4 (1.1) 10 (1.1)
 TX 6 (1.6) 14 (1.5)
N stage 0.010
 N0 254 (69.4) 651 (71.9)
 N1 71 (19.4) 125 (13.8)
 > N1 22 (6.0) 45 (5.0)
 NX 19 (5.2) 84 (9.3)
M staging 0.730
 M0 362 (98.9) 896 (99.1)
 M1 4 (1.1) 8 (0.9)
Grading 0.750
 I 38 (10.4) 117 (12.9)
 II 179 (48.9) 409 (45.2)
 III 134 (36.6) 312 (34.5)
 Unknown 15 (4.1) 67 (7.4)
Ki-67 (%) 0.130
 ≤ 20 242 (66.1) 568 (62.8)
 > 20 67 (18.3) 152 (16.8)
 Unknown 57 (15.6) 185 (20.4)
Hormonal status 0.140
 ER+/PR+ 272 (73.2) 650 (71.8)
 ER+/PR– 14 (4.1) 53 (5.9)
 ER–/PR+ 2 (0.5) 6 (0.7)
 ER–/PR– 32 (9.3) 54 (6.0)
 Unknown 46 (12.8) 142 (15.7)

Data are presented as number (%).

S-D=screen-detected; MCR=Modena Cancer Registry; ER=estrogen receptor; PR=progesterone receptor.

*Mean±SD.