Table 3. The relative frequency and OR (95% CI) of breast cancer risk in association with Allium vegetables between controls and cases (total-population*).
Variable | Case (n = 285) No. (%) |
Control (n = 297) No. (%) |
p-value† | OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI)‡ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total onion (g/day) | < 0.001 | ||||
< 4.0 | 68 (23.9) | 99 (33.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
4.0–53.5 | 78 (27.4) | 98 (33.0) | 1.20 (0.70–1.90) | 1.18 (0.73–1.91) | |
> 53.5 | 139 (48.8) | 100 (33.7) | 2.02 (1.35–3.02)§ | 0.85 (0.53–1.36) | |
p for trend | 0.875 | 0.689 | |||
Raw onion (g/day) | 0.437 | ||||
< 1.0 | 112 (39.3) | 104 (35.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
1.0–7.1 | 76 (26.7) | 92 (31.0) | 0.80 (0.5–1.10) | 0.67 (0.41–1.09) | |
> 7.1 | 97 (34.0) | 101 (34.0) | 0.90 (0.6–1.30) | 0.63 (0.40–1.00) | |
p for trend | 0.080 | 0.075 | |||
Cooked onion (g/day) | < 0.001 | ||||
< 1.0 | 95 (33.3) | 150 (50.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
1.0–42.8 | 43 (15.1) | 45 (15.2) | 1.50 (0.90–2.50) | 2.17 (1.25–3.77)§ | |
> 42.8 | 147 (51.6) | 102 (34.3) | 2.20 (1.60–3.30)§ | 1.33 (0.86–2.06) | |
p for trend | 0.078 | 1.222 | |||
Garlic (g/day) | 0.003 | ||||
< 0.34 | 79 (27.7) | 122 (41.0) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
0.34–1.0 | 101 (35.4) | 86 (29.0) | 1.80 (1.20–2.70)§ | 1.71 (1.00–2.90) | |
> 1.0 | 105 (36.9) | 89 (30.0) | 1.80 (1.20–3.20)§ | 1.25 (0.81–1.92) | |
p for trend | 0.087 | 1.101 | |||
Leek (g/day) | 0.026 | ||||
< 0.66 | 104 (36.5) | 81 (27.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
0.66–2.85 | 87 (30.5) | 90 (30.3) | 0.70 (0.50–1.10) | 0.68 (0.43–1.08) | |
> 2.85 | 94 (33.0) | 126 (42.4) | 0.60 (0.40–0.90)§ | 0.33 (0.20–0.54)§ | |
p for trend | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval.
*Total population is a term referred to both consumers and nonconsumers;†Chi-square test was performed; ‡Adjusted for confounders included age (≤48, >48 yr), menopause (yes or no), total calorie (≤2,148, >2,148 kcal/day), dietary fat (≤104, >104 g/day), dietary fiber (≤17, >17 g/day), and body mass index (≤24.9, 25-29.9, and >30 kg/m2); §Statistically significant (p<0.05).