Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 23;19(3):292–300. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.292

Table 4. The relative frequency and OR (95% CI) of breast cancer risk in association with Allium vegetables between cases and controls.

Variable Case (n = 285)
No. (%)
Control (n = 297)
No. (%)
p-value* OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Total onion (g/day) 0.043
 Nonconsumers 51 (17.9) 73 (24.6) 1.00 1.00
 Consumers 234 (82.1) 224 (75.4) 1.50 (1.00–2.20) 1.05 (0.61–1.81)
Raw onion (g/day) 0.285
 Nonconsumers 112 (39.3) 104 (35.0) 1.00 1.00
 Consumers 173 (60.7) 193 (65.0) 0.80 (0.6–1.20) 0.73 (0.48–2.70)
Cooked onion (g/day) < 0.001
 Nonconsumers 95 (33.3) 150 (50.5) 1.00 1.00
 Consumers 190 (66.7) 147 (49.5) 2.04 (1.45–2.85)§ 1.54 (1.02–2.32)§
Garlic (g/day) 0.001
 Nonconsumers 79 (27.7) 122 (41.1) 1.00 1.00
 Consumers 206 (72.3) 175 (58.9) 1.80 (1.30–2.60)§ 1.39 (0.81–2.37)
Leek (g/day) 0.053
 Nonconsumers 77 (27.0) 60 (20.2) 1.00 1.00
 Consumers 208 (73.0) 237 (79.8) 0.68 (0.46–1.00) 0.32 (0.18–0.56)§

OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval.

*Chi-square test was done; Unconditional logistic regression analysis was also performed to assess the risk breast development through exposure to either independent variables, i.e., the condition of prebiotic food usage (dichotomous variable) or tertile of usage; Unconditional multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders included age (≤48, >48 yr), menopause (yes or no), total calorie intake (≤2,148, >2,148 kcal/day), dietary fat (≤104, >104 g/day), dietary fiber (≤17, >17 g/day), and body mass index (≤24.9, 25–29.9, and >30 kg/m2); §Statistically significant (p<0.05).