Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 12;172(1):111–121. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13803

Table 3.

Clinical response to FEAM conditioning regimen and patient status at last follow‐up

Before FEAM After FEAM
Response N (%) Response N (%) Clinical status N (%)
All patients (n = 122) CR 57 (47·6) CR 101 (82·8) CR 87 (71·3)
PR 50 (41) PR 9 (7·4) PR 5 (4·1)
RD 15 (12·3) RD 9 (7·4) PD 12 (9·8)
DT DT 3 (2·4)a DT 18 (14·8)
According to response to upfront chemotherapy
Primary refractory (n = 64) CR 21 (32·8) CR 47 (73·5) CR 39 (60·9)
PR 31 (48·4) PR 7 (10·9) PR 4 (6·3)
RD 12 (18·8) RD 7 (10·9) PD 6 (9·4)
DT DT 3 (4·7)a DT 15 (23·4)
Early relapse (n = 32) CR 23 (71·9) CR 29 (90·6) CR 25 (78·1)
PR 8 (25·0) PR 2 (6·3) PR 1 (3·1)
RD 1 (3·1) RD 1 (3·1) PD 5 (15·7)
DT DT 0a DT 1 (3·1)
Relapse (n = 26) CR 13 (5·0) CR 25 (96·2) CR 23 (88·5)
PR 11 (42·3) PR 0 PR 0
RD 2 (7·7) RD 1 (3·8) PD 1 (3·8)
DT DT 0a DT 2 (7·7)

Primary refractory disease: failure to achieve CR, progression during first line chemotherapy or transient response (CR/PR lasting <3 months); early relapsed disease, CR lasting <12 months; relapsed disease, CR lasting >12 months).

FEAM, fotemustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; RD, resistant disease; PD, progression of disease; DT, death; ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation.

a

Transplant‐related mortality.