Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 6;11(10):e0164334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164334

Table 5. Sensitivity of the EQ-5D index scores using China, UK, Japan and Korea weights.

Group China UK Japan Korea
Gender* (male vs female)
 ES 0.101 0.117 0.112 0.103
 RE 1.000 1.326 1.220 1.043
Age* (15–44 vs ≥ 65 yrs)
 ES 1.579 1.518 1.545 1.538
 RE 1.000 0.920 0.964 0.984
Education* (college and higher vs below primary)
 ES 1.017 0.972 0.994 1.027
 RE 1.000 0.967 0.984 0.968
Income* (lowest vs highest group)
 ES 0.173 0.158 0.163 0.170
 RE 1.000 0.796 0.857 0.873
Employment status* (employed vs unempolyed)
 ES 0.203 0.221 0.215 0.203
 RE 1.000 1.028 1.009 1.004
Chronic condition* (yes vs no)
 ES 0.617 0.672 0.663 0.629
 RE 1.000 1.243 1.154 0.958
Disease/injury * (yes vs no)
 ES 0.777 0.763 0.767 0.787
 RE 1.000 1.257 1.135 0.906
Outpatient visit * (yes vs no)
 ES 1.040 1.005 1.019 1.066
 RE 1.000 1.282 1.139 0.891
Hospitalization * (yes vs no)
 ES 0.354 0.339 0.348 0.355
 RE 1.000 1.106 1.057 0.914
Global rating* (excellent vs poor)
 ES 2.252 2.164 2.194 2.180
 RE 1.000 1.124 1.075 0.942
VAS score* (≥ median vs < median)
 ES 0.371 0.404 0.389 0.356
 RE 1.000 1.184 1.098 0.924

ES: effect size; RE: relative efficiency; vs: versus.

*: The EQ-5D index scores of different subgroups were significantly different using the same weights (P < 0.05).