Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 4;7(19):27988–27999. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8569

Table 3. Univariate analysis of PFS according to eNOS polymorphisms in the training and validation cohorts.

Training cohort Validation cohort
No. of Patients No. of Events Median PFS (95% CI) HR (95% CI) P No. of Patients No. of Events Median PFS (95% CI) HR (95% CI) P
Overall 38 3.9 (2.7-5.7) - - 73 4.6 (2.6-5.7) - -
eNOS-786
 TT 15 15 2.6 (1.1-2.8) 4.43 (2.08-9.42) 0.0001 37 35 2.0 (1.6-2.1) 5.81 (3.43-9.82) <0.0001
 CC+TC 26 23 5.8 (3.8-8.7) 1.00 50 38 6.9 (5.6-14.5) 1.00
eNOS VNTR
 4bb 26 25 2.8 (2.3-4.6) 2.08 (1.01-4.29) 0.046 62 52 2.5 (2.1-4.8) 1.97 (1.18-3.31) 0.010
 4ab+4aa 13 11 8.5 (3.8-15.3) 1.00 24 21 6.1 (4.7-23.9) 1.00
eNOS+894
 GG 18 16 2.8 (2.3-3.8) 2.00 (1.00-3.99) 0.049 42 40 2.5 (2.0-3.7) 2.17 (1.35-3.49) 0.001
 GT+TT 23 22 5.5 (3.7-8.5) 1.00 45 33 6.9 (4.8-12.8) 1.00
eNOS Haplotypes * (786/VNTR)
 HT1/HT1 14 14 2.6 (1.1-2.8) 5.43 (2.46-11.98) <0.0001 35 33 2.0 (1.6-2.1) 5.16 (3.06-8.68) <0.0001
 Other 25 22 5.8 (3.8-8.7) 1.00 51 40 6.7 (5.0-13.8) 1.00

PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; HR, hazard ratio.

*

Haplotypes (HT) 1 shows the allele T at eNOS-786 and allele 4b at eNOS VNTR. “Other” indicates haplotypes other than the one indicated.