Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 12;7(19):28556–28569. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8699

Table 2. Comparison of EUS-FNA cytology results with reference standards for initial study cohort.

Benign/Inflammatory/Pseudocyst
(n = 18; %)
Mucinous
(n = 10; %)
CEI
(n = 9; %)
PDAC
(n = 18; %)
Total
(%)
Insufficient (C1) 4 (22.2) 1 (10) 1 (11.1) 1 (5.6) 7 (12.7)
Benign (C2) 13 (72.2) 2 (20) 1 (11.1) 0 (0) 16 (29.1)
Atypical cells (C3) 1 (5.6) 7 (70) 3 (33.3) 0 (0) 11 (20)
Suspicious (C4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (11.1) 2 (3.6)
Malignant (C5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (44.4) 15 (83.3) 19 (34.5)

Reference Standard is taken to be the combination of results and MDT opinion or surgical histology. CEI, carcinoma-ex-IPMN; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

C1, C3 and C4 were considered indeterminate results.