Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 24;34(12):2062–2080. doi: 10.1002/sim.6475

Table 4.

Treatment effect estimates results from applying the standard models and our missing data model to the schizophrenia meta‐analysis example.

Fixed effect models Random effects models
Posterior median Posterior median
(95%CI) (95%CI)
Between studies
Odds ratio Odds ratio standard deviation
Standard models Complete cases 3.75 (2.66, 5.37) 8.51 (3.63, 30.66) 1.41 (0.70, 2.80)
All missing are failures 3.65 (2.65, 5.09) 7.60 (3.48, 26.80) 1.27 (0.58, 2.66)
Best‐case scenario 6.16 (4.40, 8.74) 12.92 (5.42, 48.38) 1.44 (0.72, 2.86)
Worst‐case scenario 1.69 (1.26, 2.29) 4.39 (1.60, 14.96) 1.81 (1.11, 3.15)
πi,kmiss=0
3.59 (2.63, 4.97) 7.06 (3.38, 21.63) 1.19 (0.56, 2.41)
Missing data
πi,kmissBeta(1,1)
3.76 (2.67, 5.37) 5.80 (2.96, 15.34) 1.01 (0.37, 2.12)
framework
πi,kmissBeta(5,5)
3.35 (2.44, 4.62) 5.41 (2.83, 14.05) 1.05 (0.46, 2.12)
models priors
πi,kmissBeta(3,7)
3.46 (2.52, 4.77) 5.92 (3.02, 15.71) 1.08 (0.50, 2.15)
πi,1missBeta(3,7)andπi,2missBeta(5,5)
3.89 (2.83, 5.37) 6.53 (3.37, 17.64) 1.05 (0.48, 2.16)
log(I M O R i,k)= log(ϕ i,k) ∼ Normal(0,1) 4.09 (2.86, 5.90) 8.60 (3.64, 35.41) 1.39 (0.66, 3.00)