. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2016 Aug;52(8):1206–1216. doi: 10.1037/dev0000155

Table 3.

Full Correlation Matrix

Task	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1. Raven’s matrices	1	−.172^° (.174)	−.328^° (.008)	−.117^° (.356)	−.082 (.521)	−.316 (.011)	.121 (.342)	.136 (.288)
2. Age		1	−.247^° (.033)	−.315^° (.006)	−.267 (.032)	−.304 (.015)	−.581^* (.000)	.504^* (.000)
3. Numerosity CVN 24			1	.367^° (.001)	.360 (.004)	.447^* (.000)	.338 (.006)	−.432^* (.000)
4. Numerosity CVN 250				1	.135 (.291)	.277 (.027)	.167 (.188)	−.200 (.116)
5. Motion Threshold (^°s⁻¹)					1	.177 (.165)	.155 (.224)	−.212 (.094)
6. Mat errors						1	.370 (.003)	.813^* (.000)
7. Mat speed							1	.813^* (.000)
8. Math ability index								1

Note. Analyses are carried out considering only children. Bivariate Pearson correlation coefficients. Significant correlations highlighted in bold. Bonferroni corrected alpha level = .001 (.05/29).

^°

N subjects 73 (N 63 all the others correlations).

p < .001.