Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 19;19(2):234–252. doi: 10.1111/hex.12341

Table 4.

Panel member responses to feedback survey statements

Feedback statement Strongly agree Agree Neither Disagree Strongly disagree
Concept and content of the QPL
I thought the questions in the QPL were easy to follow 22.2 72.2 5.5 0 0
I thought the QPL was too long 0 22.2 44.4 33.3 0
I thought the QPL used appropriate language which can be easily understood by parents and carers of children with ADHD 11.1 88.8 0 0 0
I thought the QPL covered questions that are relevant to parents and carers of children with ADHD 44.4 50 5.5 0 0
I thought the language used in the QPL was too clinical for use by parents and carers of children with ADHD 0 11.1 5.5 77.7 5.5
I believe the QPL will benefit parents and carers of children with ADHD 22.2 72.2 5.5 0 0
I believe the QPL will encourage discussion between parents of children with ADHD and healthcare professionals 16.6 72.2 11.1 0 0
I would recommend the QPL to other parents or healthcare professionals 16.6 72.2 11.1 0 0
The Delphi research process
I thought the participation of healthcare professionals in this study was important 55.5 44.4 0 0 0
I thought the participation of researchers in this study was important 50 33.3 16.6 0 0
I thought the participation of parents in this study was important 72.2 27.7 0 0 0
I thought the participation of ADHD consumer advocates in this study was important 33.3 61.1 5.5 0 0
I thought the use of emails was an appropriate way to be contacted by the researchers 61.1 38.8 0 0 0
I thought the use of online surveys was a good way to collect data and feedback 61.1 38.8 0 0 0
I thought the online surveys were clear and easy to follow 44.4 55.5 0 0 0
I thought the summary information provided by the researchers about the results of each round was important 33.3 66.6 0 0 0
I thought the instructions for the two follow‐up surveys were clear and easy to follow 22.2 88.8 0 0 0
I thought the summary tables provided in follow‐up surveys for the questions to be re‐rated were useful 27.7 61.1 5.5 0 0
I would recommend the Delphi method for other research projects about ADHD 22.2 66.6 11.1 0 0
I believe the Delphi process can be of benefit to the development of QPLs for other medical conditions 16.6 72.2 11.1 0 0
I thought the time commitment was appropriate for this study 22.2 77.7 0 0 0
I believe the remuneration is appropriate 16.6 61.1 16.6 5.5 0
I thought that participating in this research was worthwhile 55.5 44.4 0 0 0
I enjoyed participating in this Delphi study 55.5 38.8 5.5 0 0

ADHD, attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder; QPL, question prompt list.