Table 4.
Feedback statement | Strongly agree | Agree | Neither | Disagree | Strongly disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concept and content of the QPL | |||||
I thought the questions in the QPL were easy to follow | 22.2 | 72.2 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the QPL was too long | 0 | 22.2 | 44.4 | 33.3 | 0 |
I thought the QPL used appropriate language which can be easily understood by parents and carers of children with ADHD | 11.1 | 88.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the QPL covered questions that are relevant to parents and carers of children with ADHD | 44.4 | 50 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the language used in the QPL was too clinical for use by parents and carers of children with ADHD | 0 | 11.1 | 5.5 | 77.7 | 5.5 |
I believe the QPL will benefit parents and carers of children with ADHD | 22.2 | 72.2 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 |
I believe the QPL will encourage discussion between parents of children with ADHD and healthcare professionals | 16.6 | 72.2 | 11.1 | 0 | 0 |
I would recommend the QPL to other parents or healthcare professionals | 16.6 | 72.2 | 11.1 | 0 | 0 |
The Delphi research process | |||||
I thought the participation of healthcare professionals in this study was important | 55.5 | 44.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the participation of researchers in this study was important | 50 | 33.3 | 16.6 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the participation of parents in this study was important | 72.2 | 27.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the participation of ADHD consumer advocates in this study was important | 33.3 | 61.1 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the use of emails was an appropriate way to be contacted by the researchers | 61.1 | 38.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the use of online surveys was a good way to collect data and feedback | 61.1 | 38.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the online surveys were clear and easy to follow | 44.4 | 55.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the summary information provided by the researchers about the results of each round was important | 33.3 | 66.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the instructions for the two follow‐up surveys were clear and easy to follow | 22.2 | 88.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the summary tables provided in follow‐up surveys for the questions to be re‐rated were useful | 27.7 | 61.1 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 |
I would recommend the Delphi method for other research projects about ADHD | 22.2 | 66.6 | 11.1 | 0 | 0 |
I believe the Delphi process can be of benefit to the development of QPLs for other medical conditions | 16.6 | 72.2 | 11.1 | 0 | 0 |
I thought the time commitment was appropriate for this study | 22.2 | 77.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I believe the remuneration is appropriate | 16.6 | 61.1 | 16.6 | 5.5 | 0 |
I thought that participating in this research was worthwhile | 55.5 | 44.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I enjoyed participating in this Delphi study | 55.5 | 38.8 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 |
ADHD, attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder; QPL, question prompt list.