Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jul 22;34(9):1248–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.07.004

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Top: Bar plots showing mean GE and SE CBV, GE and SE CBF, and mVD relative to normal tissue for the sSAGE and SAGE methods. Bottom: Bar plots showing mean Ktrans and ve for the sSAGE, and SAGE methods. There were no significant differences between sSAGE and SAGE (p>0.05, n = 8).